From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-23-ewr.dyndns.com (mxout-095-ewr.mailhop.org [216.146.33.95]) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6BAB2E0044 for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 07:33:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scan-22-ewr.mailhop.org (scan-22-ewr.local [10.0.141.244]) by mail-23-ewr.dyndns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 117273FC81 for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 14:33:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 () X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS X-Originating-IP: 209.85.220.171 Received: from mail-vx0-f171.google.com (mail-vx0-f171.google.com [209.85.220.171]) by mail-23-ewr.dyndns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C9141679 for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 14:33:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vxc40 with SMTP id 40so6206668vxc.16 for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 07:33:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UJOlMAVqGFiRNAlPwMKZLZ+inL4gA2tZj4pqmEJNovg=; b=Lf6Tq5bMRumPAOlV4Ta5+hGYqdeRTpRDYAHd9jXlMB3qJSSiCP0NI54p24Hso4yxsE Fu1VHheJRqRjcsYfRS6n5WLPCgJ1cTc3YPETnucsebPTp5IH+Pw2YOuMaBEWGc2tidQl EC6hPyQq+qlGXSdNCYWYFCWeemPE7w+V3Txtw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=p5nYqyX4zZGE3NdiIZBo/lysGXp8JhpeFFdowGGFacsPN3F/1dvzpfKgbkp2k2blOK pOm/rx71RLZbVkT28530M0VcRG2MDtY8skeUax4GQR77bP+k4a8GwRJ6l87Jw8QK8Yp6 GaXywiW7SAWduQRXRZv7D4lb9Zc9ugTxXmjyw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.200.76 with SMTP id ev12mr912992vcb.36.1300631594965; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 07:33:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.118.204 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 07:33:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <0D59AD34-AA64-4376-BB8E-58C5D378F488@gmail.com> <4D829B58.1070601@swin.edu.au> Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 15:33:14 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Fwd: [Bloat] Progress with latency-under-load tool From: Pedro Tumusok To: Bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers working on AQM, device drivers, and networking stacks" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 14:33:25 -0000 Keep forgetting to reply all, sorry! ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Pedro Tumusok Date: Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 3:28 PM Subject: Re: [Bloat] Progress with latency-under-load tool To: Jonathan Morton > > Horrible, isn't it? =A0I deliberately left these machines with standard c= onfigurations in order to show that. > Is there any point in running this on a CPE? Or would it be better to have it for host to host connections? -- Best regards / Mvh Jan Pedro Tumusok --=20 Best regards / Mvh Jan Pedro Tumusok