From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-14-iad.dyndns.com (mxout-120-iad.mailhop.org [216.146.32.120]) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A270D2E015C for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 01:50:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scan-12-iad.mailhop.org (scan-12-iad.local [10.150.0.209]) by mail-14-iad.dyndns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11CCA44AEDE for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 08:50:25 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS X-Originating-IP: 209.85.161.43 Received: from mail-fx0-f43.google.com (mail-fx0-f43.google.com [209.85.161.43]) by mail-14-iad.dyndns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D52344AE44 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 08:50:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm3 with SMTP id 3so8103221fxm.16 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 01:50:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=uceJyreSD4ZlcAr9PjimNMymdbHEK31Jw9wiB5+JgXI=; b=Sh+o7vGMPo2kwUMub5bSKflI1FPYkrVHhC6d+IoM7da7ikx5gLyGuzVIqvaR/uDo88 QTOnJzHbdwvyqQTTGvtrXVaNleNotBzE1+gz6TYtZXppNgaczPiIVi6vXJLuAoNrj3Eq gvNZT7SilkFE/n8ORWo47r67Qfnd9zCw6V1lg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=uSZHpSL6U9G2ie4Jtd0WRFGcoMVuVQpWjRSD3V9BlGhBrfWfppGyze+jonac5edJcm AbixHEOXARAmJ0qFKJIZCN+hudV1Tht+K48ULuQ8g43/vgxbx9DBo1Uf/Pd8DNgVxz56 ZqpRI9ncQtuBNZBO+ux6uHxw3T7pvZBuv2ocM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.73.133 with SMTP id q5mr913025faj.127.1300783817535; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 01:50:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.61.209 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 01:50:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5B81121B-300E-40F6-9DA7-9170B5221639@gmail.com> References: <87wrjsbki1.fsf@cruithne.co.teklibre.org> <92F8B514-76F9-45E5-BB9F-C94BA1CA66B4@gmail.com> <5B81121B-300E-40F6-9DA7-9170B5221639@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 09:50:17 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: debloat-testing loadlatency test From: Pedro Tumusok To: Jonathan Morton Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-BeenThere: bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers working on AQM, device drivers, and networking stacks" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 08:50:26 -0000 Hi, I compiled this and started a test last night before going to bed. This is on my internal network, which is a mess in this regard, but I had to test first. PC with client - Router/AP - Switch - Homeplug - Homplug - PC with server PC with client is a laptop with Ubuntu 10.10 PC with client connects to the router/ap via wireless. The router/ap is connected to the switch, the router/ap switch is GE but the external switch is FE. The connection between the router/ap and switch is 100Mb. Connection between switch and homeplug is 100Mb Unknown connection speed/sync between homeplugs. Homeplug to PC with server is 100Mb PC with server is running Ubuntu 10.10 jpt@jpt-laptop:~/Bloat/bufferbloat$ ./loadlatency 172.18.18.59 Selected client ID 6374F8B526CC5866 Connected to 172.18.18.59, waiting for response... Server responding, beginning test... MinRTT: 1.8ms Scenario 1: 0 uploads, 1 downloads... 1903 KiB/s down, 0.81 Hz smoothness Scenario 2: 1 uploads, 0 downloads... 2022 KiB/s up, 6.87 Hz smoothness Scenario 3: 0 uploads, 2 downloads... 2204 KiB/s down, 0.78 Hz smoothness Scenario 4: 1 uploads, 1 downloads... 981 KiB/s up, 1130 KiB/s down, 0.53 Hz smoothness Scenario 5: 2 uploads, 0 downloads... 1981 KiB/s up, 4.86 Hz smoothness Scenario 6: 0 uploads, 3 downloads... 2203 KiB/s down, 1.07 Hz smoothness Scenario 7: 1 uploads, 2 downloads... 748 KiB/s up, 1283 KiB/s down, 0.39 Hz smoothness Scenario 8: 2 uploads, 1 downloads... 1032 KiB/s up, 936 KiB/s down, 0.33 Hz smoothness Scenario 9: 3 uploads, 0 downloads... 2039 KiB/s up, 5.25 Hz smoothness Scenario 10: 0 uploads, 4 downloads... 2275 KiB/s down, 1.03 Hz smoothness Scenario 11: 1 uploads, 3 downloads... 840 KiB/s up, 1278 KiB/s down, 0.40 Hz smoothness Scenario 12: 2 uploads, 2 downloads... 911 KiB/s up, 1221 KiB/s down, 0.36 Hz smoothness Scenario 13: 3 uploads, 1 downloads... 1068 KiB/s up, 929 KiB/s down, 0.54 Hz smoothness Scenario 14: 4 uploads, 0 downloads... 2055 KiB/s up, 3.23 Hz smoothness Scenario 15: 0 uploads, 32 downloads... 2251 KiB/s down, 0.44 Hz smoothness Scenario 16: 1 uploads, 31 downloads... 534 KiB/s up, 1578 KiB/s down, 0.07 Hz smoothness Scenario 17: 16 uploads, 16 downloads... 695 KiB/s up, 1329 KiB/s down, 0.07 Hz smoothness Scenario 18: 31 uploads, 1 downloads... 1073 KiB/s up, 1007 KiB/s down, 0.36 Hz smoothness Scenario 19: 32 uploads, 0 downloads... 2119 KiB/s up, 1.08 Hz smoothness OVERALL: Upload Capacity: 1058 KiB/s Download Capacity: 1385 KiB/s Link Responsiveness: 0 Hz Flow Smoothness: 0 Hz jpt@jpt-laptop:~/Bloat/bufferbloat$ jpt@jpt-laptop:~/Bloat/bufferbloat$ I'll do an elimination of units to get some comparison numbers, ie PC to PC directly connected, the PC to PC through a switch an so forth. After that, I'll start looking into debloating the network. Pedro