Historic archive of defunct list bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Thoughts on Stochastic Fair Blue
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 09:44:08 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikzQvp07qa9PmEP=ng8hcuNwqGDRomRoC-d7VE3@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1300973556.3747.9.camel@edumazet-laptop>

Can we try to keep coding stuff on bloat-devel? The traffic level on
bloat is (wonderfully) huge as it is, but a goodly percentage of the
audience can't deal at this level.

Eric had also sent me an interesting attempt at a 4 band pfifo_fast,
which explicitly prioritized ecn-enabled packets, I was wondering if
he could resend?

How does all these stuff cope with encapsulated (vpn/6in4) packets? UDP packets?

On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> Le jeudi 24 mars 2011 à 14:40 +0200, Jonathan Morton a écrit :
>
>> Finally, it might also be interesting and useful to add bare-bones ECN
>> support to the existing "dumb" qdiscs, such as SFQ and the FIFO
>> family.  Simply start marking (and dropping non-supporting flows) when
>> the queue is more than half full.
>
> Three months ago, I played with a SFQ patch to add ECN support, based on
> delay of packet in queue.
>
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg151594.html
>
> This patch is a hack of course (units are jiffies ticks, not ms)
>
>
> --------------------------------------
>
> Here is the POC patch I am currently testing, with a probability to
> "early drop" a packet of one percent per ms (HZ=1000 here), only if
> packet stayed at least 4 ms on queue.
>
> Of course, this only apply where SFQ is used, with known SFQ limits :)
>
> The term "early drop" is a lie. RED really early mark/drop a packet at
> enqueue() time, while I do it at dequeue() time [since I need to compute
> the delay]. But effect is the same on sent packets. This might use a bit
> more memory, but no more than current SFQ [and only if flows dont react
> to mark/drops]
>
> insmod net/sched/sch_sfq.ko red_delay=4
>
> By the way, I do think we should lower SFQ_DEPTH a bit and increase
> SFQ_SLOTS by same amount. Allowing 127 packets per flow seems not
> necessary in most situations SFQ might be used.
>
>  net/sched/sch_sfq.c |   37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sched/sch_sfq.c b/net/sched/sch_sfq.c
> index d54ac94..4f958e3 100644
> --- a/net/sched/sch_sfq.c
> +++ b/net/sched/sch_sfq.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
>  #include <net/ip.h>
>  #include <net/netlink.h>
>  #include <net/pkt_sched.h>
> +#include <net/inet_ecn.h>
> +#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
>
>
>  /*     Stochastic Fairness Queuing algorithm.
> @@ -86,6 +88,10 @@
>  /* This type should contain at least SFQ_DEPTH + SFQ_SLOTS values */
>  typedef unsigned char sfq_index;
>
> +static int red_delay; /* default : no RED handling */
> +module_param(red_delay, int, 0);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(red_delay, "mark/drop packets if they stay in queue longer than red_delay ticks");
> +
>  /*
>  * We dont use pointers to save space.
>  * Small indexes [0 ... SFQ_SLOTS - 1] are 'pointers' to slots[] array
> @@ -391,6 +397,7 @@ sfq_enqueue(struct sk_buff *skb, struct Qdisc *sch)
>
>        sch->qstats.backlog += qdisc_pkt_len(skb);
>        slot_queue_add(slot, skb);
> +       qdisc_skb_cb(skb)->timestamp = jiffies;
>        sfq_inc(q, x);
>        if (slot->qlen == 1) {          /* The flow is new */
>                if (q->tail == NULL) {  /* It is the first flow */
> @@ -402,11 +409,8 @@ sfq_enqueue(struct sk_buff *skb, struct Qdisc *sch)
>                q->tail = slot;
>                slot->allot = q->scaled_quantum;
>        }
> -       if (++sch->q.qlen <= q->limit) {
> -               sch->bstats.bytes += qdisc_pkt_len(skb);
> -               sch->bstats.packets++;
> +       if (++sch->q.qlen <= q->limit)
>                return NET_XMIT_SUCCESS;
> -       }
>
>        sfq_drop(sch);
>        return NET_XMIT_CN;
> @@ -432,6 +436,7 @@ sfq_dequeue(struct Qdisc *sch)
>        sfq_index a, next_a;
>        struct sfq_slot *slot;
>
> +restart:
>        /* No active slots */
>        if (q->tail == NULL)
>                return NULL;
> @@ -455,12 +460,36 @@ next_slot:
>                next_a = slot->next;
>                if (a == next_a) {
>                        q->tail = NULL; /* no more active slots */
> +                       /* last packet queued, dont even try to apply RED */
>                        return skb;
>                }
>                q->tail->next = next_a;
>        } else {
>                slot->allot -= SFQ_ALLOT_SIZE(qdisc_pkt_len(skb));
>        }
> +       if (red_delay) {
> +               long delay = jiffies - qdisc_skb_cb(skb)->timestamp;
> +
> +               if (delay >= red_delay) {
> +                       long Px = delay * (0xFFFFFF / 100); /* 1 percent per jiffy */
> +                       if ((net_random() & 0xFFFFFF) < Px) {
> +                               if (INET_ECN_set_ce(skb)) {
> +                                       /* no ecnmark counter yet :) */
> +                                       sch->qstats.overlimits++;
> +                               } else {
> +                                       /* penalize this flow : we drop the
> +                                        * packet while we changed slot->allot
> +                                        */
> +                                       kfree_skb(skb);
> +                                       /* no early_drop counter yet :) */
> +                                       sch->qstats.drops++;
> +                                       goto restart;
> +                               }
> +                       }
> +               }
> +       }
> +       sch->bstats.bytes += qdisc_pkt_len(skb);
> +       sch->bstats.packets++;
>        return skb;
>  }
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>



-- 
Dave Täht
SKYPE: davetaht
US Tel: 1-239-829-5608
http://the-edge.blogspot.com

       reply	other threads:[~2011-03-24 13:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <AB70D849-EC48-438E-B009-E22223CAF5E2@gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <7imxklz5vu.fsf@lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr>
     [not found]   ` <160809C8-284C-4463-97FE-0E2F03C08589@gmail.com>
     [not found]     ` <1300973556.3747.9.camel@edumazet-laptop>
2011-03-24 13:44       ` Dave Taht [this message]
2011-03-24 13:55         ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-24 13:57         ` Jonathan Morton
2011-03-24 14:20           ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='AANLkTikzQvp07qa9PmEP=ng8hcuNwqGDRomRoC-d7VE3@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox