Historic archive of defunct list bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathaniel Smith <njs@pobox.com>
To: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net, johannes@sipsolutions.net,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] mac80211: implement eBDP algorithm to fight bufferbloat
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:21:50 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimahYNo0ZHr9PU217CWJQP6ssuhaxguYVz7dX_-@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110223222842.GA20039@tuxdriver.com>

On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 2:28 PM, John W. Linville
<linville@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 03:26:32PM -0800, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> But for this calculation to make sense, we need T to be the time it
>> takes the card to transmit 1 fragment. In your patch, you're not
>> measuring that. You're measuring the total time between when a packet
>> is enqueued and when it is transmitted; if there were K packets in the
>> queue ahead of it, then this is the time to send *all* of them --
>> you're measuring (K+1)*T. That's why in my patch, I recorded the
>> current size of the queue when each packet is enqueued, so I could
>> compute T = total_time / (K+1).
>
> Thanks for the math!  I think I see what you are saying now.  Since the
> measured time is being used to determine the queue size, we need to
> factor-in the length of the queue that resulted in that measurment.
>
> Unfortunately, I'm not sure how to apply this with the technique I
> am using for the timing measurements. :-(  I'll have to think about
> this some more...

I guess an ugly but effective approach would be to steal some bits
from the timestamp... something like (untested, and probably needs
some sign-extension bugs fixed):

#define LATENCY_BITS 8
#define ENQUEUED_BITS 24
BUILD_BUG_ON(LATENCY_BITS + ENQUEUED_BITS != 32);

static ktime_t _ktime_get_and_stash(int enqueued) {
        timespec now = ktime_to_timespec(ktime_get());
        now.sec &= (1 << LATENCY_BITS) - 1;
        BUG_ON(enqueued > (1 << ENQUEUED_BITS));
        now.sec |= enqueued << LATENCY_BITS;
        return timespec_to_ktime(now);
}

static u64 _ktime_diff_to_now_and_unstash(ktime_t then, int * enqueued) {

        timespec ts_then = ktime_to_timespec(then);
        timespec ts_now = ktime_to_timespec(ktime_get());
        *enqueued = ts_then.tv_sec >> LATENCY_BITS;
        ts_then.tv_sec &= (1 << LATENCY_BITS) - 1;
        ts_now.tv_sec &= (1 << LATENCY_BITS) - 1;
        if (ts_now.tv_sec < ts_then.tv_sec)
                ts_now.tv_sec += (1 << LATENCY_BITS);
         timespec_sub(ts_now, ts_then);
}

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-25 18:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1297619803-2832-1-git-send-email-njs@pobox.com>
2011-02-17  1:49 ` [RFC] " John W. Linville
2011-02-17  3:31   ` Ben Greear
2011-02-17  4:26   ` Nathaniel Smith
2011-02-17  8:31   ` Johannes Berg
2011-02-18 21:21   ` [RFC v2] " John W. Linville
2011-02-19  3:44     ` Nathaniel Smith
2011-02-21 18:47       ` John W. Linville
2011-02-21 23:26         ` Nathaniel Smith
2011-02-23 22:28           ` John W. Linville
2011-02-25 18:21             ` Nathaniel Smith [this message]
2011-02-25 18:27               ` Nathaniel Smith
2011-02-20  0:37     ` Nathaniel Smith
2011-02-20  0:51       ` Jim Gettys
2011-02-20 15:24         ` Dave Täht
2011-02-21 18:52       ` John W. Linville
2011-02-21 15:28     ` Johannes Berg
2011-02-21 16:12       ` Jim Gettys
2011-02-21 19:15         ` John W. Linville
2011-02-21 19:06       ` John W. Linville
2011-02-21 19:29         ` [RFC v2] mac80211: implement eBDP algorithm to fight bufferbloat - AQM on hosts Jim Gettys
2011-02-21 20:26         ` [RFC v2] mac80211: implement eBDP algorithm to fight bufferbloat Tianji Li
2011-02-28 13:07         ` Johannes Berg
     [not found] <x1-oTZGm1A7eclvABnv1aK0z1Nc7iI@gwene.org>
2011-02-20  1:59 ` Dave Täht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AANLkTimahYNo0ZHr9PU217CWJQP6ssuhaxguYVz7dX_-@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=njs@pobox.com \
    --cc=bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox