Historic archive of defunct list bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
Cc: esr@thyrsus.com, Eric Raymond <esr@snark.thyrsus.com>,
	bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: Preliminary results of using GPS to look for clock skew
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:58:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw4zeskspuSqmhyfuR1rTNzT6g4Zn5R1KypLUzpx7oc=PQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E7B73D2.9070002@hp.com>

On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com> wrote:
> On 09/22/2011 10:34 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Rick Jones<rick.jones2@hp.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> One thing that surprised me of late is
>>>> http://www.bufferbloat.net/issues/271
>>>>
>>>> while not related, surprises are the last thing we need as regards to
>>>> time.
>>>>
>>>
>>> The decision to stop letting networking contribute to entropy goes back a
>>> few years actually :)
>>
>> I wasn't paying attention then.
>>
>>> In another context, also where running-out of entropy was a problem,
>>> someone
>>> mentioned there are RNGs on USB keys that can be used to provide
>>> randomness/entropy/whatnot.  The one mentioned in that discussion was the
>>> "Entropy Key" from these folks: http://www.entropykey.co.uk/
>>
>> While I would like RNGs to be on-chip, the lack of randomness in a system
>> that supposedly does a lot of WPA encryption does concern me.
>>
>> https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/9631
>>
>> Secondly, routers at least have multiple interfaces to get randomness from
>> which would be hard to spoof all at the same time.
>>
>> and wireless routers have more noise sources and interfaces...
>>
>> so while I find the decision to eliminate networking as a source of
>> randomness
>> makes some sense in a device with only one interface, I find it
>> indefensible to
>> have nearly no entropy pool at all as a result for devices with
>> multiple interfaces.
>
> I don't necessarily disagree, but there were a number of reasons given, many
> of which I believe are/were independent of the number of interfaces in the
> host.  I believe at least some of it can be found at
> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0805.3/0370.html  though I
> don't think it has the thread all the way back to its beginning.

These guys are on drugs, and it doesn't look like my point about multiple
interfaces was raised...

http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0805.3/0383.html

"Nearby microwave ovens will add periodicy to the arrival of WLAN data."

Yep, that's your typical attacker, hauling a microwave oven around to
help me crack WPA...

What I want to know is how bad the decline in quality of urandom is
without random sources....


> rick
>



-- 
Dave Täht
SKYPE: davetaht
US Tel: 1-239-829-5608
http://the-edge.blogspot.com

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-22 17:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-21 23:02 Eric Raymond
2011-09-22  0:18 ` Dave Taht
2011-09-22  2:11   ` Eric Raymond
2011-09-22  2:24     ` Jonathan Morton
2011-09-22  2:29       ` Eric Raymond
2011-09-23  9:09       ` Jan Ceuleers
2011-09-23  9:38         ` Dave Taht
2011-09-23 12:10           ` Jan Ceuleers
2011-09-23 12:50             ` Rick
2011-09-24 14:50               ` Jan Ceuleers
2011-09-22  9:08     ` Dave Taht
2011-09-22 17:15       ` Rick Jones
2011-09-22 17:34         ` Dave Taht
2011-09-22 17:43           ` Rick Jones
2011-09-22 17:58             ` Dave Taht [this message]
2011-09-23 10:57           ` Aidan Williams
2011-09-23 10:10     ` Dave Taht
2011-09-23  9:09   ` Jan Ceuleers
2011-09-23  9:24 ` Jan Ceuleers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAA93jw4zeskspuSqmhyfuR1rTNzT6g4Zn5R1KypLUzpx7oc=PQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=esr@snark.thyrsus.com \
    --cc=esr@thyrsus.com \
    --cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox