From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-iy0-f171.google.com (mail-iy0-f171.google.com [209.85.210.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB692200048 for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 08:56:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by iyi12 with SMTP id 12so6209808iyi.16 for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 09:36:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=QlyQM4ouGR/p18m36E6CE4tQi1C88yec6Ig6ME4A+CE=; b=pf+MV/1cocqy1A3/eCxN1Iz0Dmd/1/8RA/FZQIwb+AfYKzXI2FIwY8VVsGOAk4dQT5 aeJoy5xwaSQvDTWG4ZK3/wO8QlPEHp8c0Xmx+lz2STsWDkhJcMKEkxXNhKQ78td0z3LM wyEhJN002tNjHUzZfHdMvNGaQE61cnf/Xl+go= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.168.199 with SMTP id x7mr8619295icy.40.1311093405211; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 09:36:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.223.2 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 09:36:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 10:36:45 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Further reducing the noise level From: Dave Taht To: bismark-devel@projectbismark.net, bloat-devel Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba6e89d8af5db104a86eb8f6 X-BeenThere: bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers working on AQM, device drivers, and networking stacks" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:56:57 -0000 --90e6ba6e89d8af5db104a86eb8f6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I've created a new item on the roadmap for bismark 'napoli' and assigned a tenative release date of mid-febuary, next year. Programmers: PLEASE REVIEW YOUR BUGS *TODAY*, prioritize them, and move wha= t can be moved to the appropriate portion of the roadmap(s). I note that there are all sorts of things left over from the previous deadlines that I would like to see move to the right projects and deadlines= , so we can get all that dead wood and milestones out of the way. Managers: Would the managers of your projects move everything that's still important and yet unfinished in the older roadmaps forward, please, to appropriate deadlines. http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/uberwrt/roadmap Lastly, many more recent bugs are uncatagorized and unprioritized, and if there are any more priority 1 and 2 bugs that I need to know about please assign them to me. ASAP. I note: It is also useful to review the closed bugs, not only just to make sure there are no regressions lurking - but to feel emotionally better abou= t how far we've come already. We are, believe it or not, in the home stretch. Normally I would call a bug review meeting for wednesday, 10AM, and am willing to do so if you guys need it, ... but it helps to have all this crufty old stuff out of the way first, so we can just focus on what is important to fix before the next smoketest, which I hope to start, wednesday night, If you can do all the above, before we attempt another smoktest, there will not need to be a need for that meeting, this week. There should definately, be a meeting next week. Lastly, I would also like the managers to add an item on the roadmap for getting the web site and database backend (networkdashboard) projects straightened out somewhat, perhaps by the november timeframe. The city-based codename I've been using mentally for the backend stuff has been the city of Dite, and I will leave that to the Italians in this crowd to explain. Please pick a better name. :) If you are feeling really ambitious... a codename on the roadmap for what can be done by september of next year, would also be good. Those with manager perms on the wiki can create their own codenames on the roadmap, without my further involvement. I can think of a few others that would help, notably whatever deadlines you need to have to have papers read= y for upcoming conferences. I'm off to fight some truly major fires besides yours, I will not be paying attention to email the rest of the day, but will check in tonight, via watching this url: http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/uberwrt/activity You might find it helpful to use that, to get insight as to other peoples's activities, to periodically click on that one, as well. On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Walter de Donato wrote: > Napoli sounds good to me ;) > > -Walter > Il giorno 19/lug/2011 00.39, "Nick Feamster" ha > scritto: > > > Sounds good to me. > > > > By the way, MLab is going to post on their blog about Bismark, possibly > tomorrow. I've cleaned up the wiki a bit to prepare for this possibility. > > > > -Nick > > > > On Jul 18, 2011, at 6:02 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Srikanth Sundaresan < > srikanth@gatech.edu> wrote: > >> Napoli? :) > >> > >> > >> I think that would be fair, given this one's codename is 'atlanta', bu= t > I don't get a vote. Nick, Walter? > >> > >> On 07/18/2011 05:54 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > >> > I would like a codename for the next release of bismark to setup on > >> > redmine's roadmap, ASAP, so we can move everything that's not > important > >> > for this release, to it, to reduce the noise level to just the stuff > >> > that needs to be fixed in this release. > >> > > >> > Some codename (perhaps a city in Italy?) would be good. > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Dave T=E4ht > >> > SKYPE: davetaht > >> > US Tel: 1-239-829-5608 > >> > http://the-edge.blogspot.com > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > bismark-devel mailing list > >> > bismark-devel@projectbismark.net > >> > http://lists.noise.gatech.edu/listinfo/bismark-devel > >> _______________________________________________ > >> bismark-devel mailing list > >> bismark-devel@projectbismark.net > >> http://lists.noise.gatech.edu/listinfo/bismark-devel > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Dave T=E4ht > >> SKYPE: davetaht > >> US Tel: 1-239-829-5608 > >> http://the-edge.blogspot.com > >> _______________________________________________ > >> bismark-devel mailing list > >> bismark-devel@projectbismark.net > >> http://lists.noise.gatech.edu/listinfo/bismark-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ > > bismark-devel mailing list > > bismark-devel@projectbismark.net > > http://lists.noise.gatech.edu/listinfo/bismark-devel > > > --=20 Dave T=E4ht SKYPE: davetaht US Tel: 1-239-829-5608 http://the-edge.blogspot.com --90e6ba6e89d8af5db104a86eb8f6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I've created a new item on the roadmap for bismark 'napoli' and= assigned a tenative release date of mid-febuary, next year.

Program= mers: PLEASE REVIEW YOUR BUGS *TODAY*, prioritize them, and move what can b= e moved to the appropriate portion of the roadmap(s).

I note that there are all sorts of things left over from the previous d= eadlines that I would like to see move to the right projects and deadlines,= so we can get all that dead wood and milestones out of the way.

Managers: Would the managers of your projects move everything that's st= ill important and yet unfinished in the older roadmaps forward, please, to = appropriate deadlines.

http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/uberwrt/roadmap<= br>
Lastly, many more recent bugs are uncatagorized and unprioritized, and = if there are any more priority 1 and 2 bugs that I need to know about pleas= e assign them to me. ASAP.

I note: It is also useful to review the c= losed bugs, not only just to make sure there are no regressions lurking - b= ut to feel emotionally better about how far we've come already. We are,= believe it or not, in the home stretch.

Normally I would call a bug review meeting for wednesday, 10AM, and am = willing to do so if you guys need it,

... but it helps to have all = this crufty old stuff out of the way first, so we can just focus on what is= important to fix before the next smoketest, which I hope to start, wednesd= ay night,

If you can do all the above, before we attempt another smoktest, there = will not need to be a need for that meeting, this week. There should defina= tely, be a meeting next week.

Lastly, I would also like the managers= to add an item on the roadmap for getting the web site and database backen= d (networkdashboard) projects straightened out somewhat, perhaps by the nov= ember timeframe.

The city-based codename I've been using mentally for the backend st= uff has been the city of Dite, and I will leave that to the Italians in thi= s crowd to explain. Please pick a better name. :)

If you are feeling= really ambitious...=A0 a codename on the roadmap for what can be done by s= eptember of next year, would also be good.

Those with manager perms on the wiki can create their own codenames on = the roadmap, without my further involvement. I can think of a few others th= at would help, notably whatever deadlines you need to have to have papers r= eady for upcoming conferences.

I'm off to fight some truly major fires besides yours, I will not b= e paying attention to email the rest of the day, but will check in tonight,= via watching this url:

http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/uberwrt/activity

You might find it helpful to use that, to get insight as to other peopl= es's activities, to periodically click on that one, as well.

On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Walter de Dona= to <walter= .dedonato@unina.it> wrote:

Napoli sounds = good to me ;)

-Walter

Il giorno 19/lug/2011 00.39, "Nick Feamster= " <feam= ster@cc.gatech.edu> ha scritto:
> Sounds good to me.
>
> By the way, MLab is going to post on their blog about Bismark, possibl= y tomorrow. I've cleaned up the wiki a bit to prepare for this possibi= lity.
>
> -Nick
>
> On Jul 18, 2011, at 6:02 PM, = Dave Taht wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 3:56 PM= , Srikanth Sundaresan <srikanth@gatech.edu> wrote:
>> Napoli? :)
>&g= t;
>>
>> I think that would be fair, given this one's codename is '= atlanta', but I don't get a vote. Nick, Walter?
>>
&g= t;> On 07/18/2011 05:54 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
>> > I would li= ke a codename for the next release of bismark to setup on
>> > redmine's roadmap, ASAP, so we can move everything that&#= 39;s not important
>> > for this release, to it, to reduce the = noise level to just the stuff
>> > that needs to be fixed in th= is release.
>> >
>> > Some codename (perhaps a city in Italy?) wou= ld be good.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Dave T=E4= ht
>> > SKYPE: davetaht
>> > US Tel: 1-239-829-5608
>> > ht= tp://the-edge.blogspot.com
>> >
>> >
>>= ; >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > bismark-devel mailing list
>> > bismark-devel@projectbismark.net
>> > http= ://lists.noise.gatech.edu/listinfo/bismark-devel
>> _______________________________________________
>> bismar= k-devel mailing list
>> bismark-devel@projectbismark.net
>>= ; http://lists.noise.gatech.edu/listinfo/bismark-devel
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dave T=E4ht=
>> SKYPE: davetaht
>> US Tel: 1-239-829-5608
>>= ; http://the-edg= e.blogspot.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> bismar= k-devel mailing list
>> bismark-devel@projectbismark.net
>>= ; http://lists.noise.gatech.edu/listinfo/bismark-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> bisma= rk-devel mailing list
> bismark-devel@projectbismark.net
> http://lists.noise.gatech.edu/listinfo/bismark-devel
>



--
Dave T=E4ht
SKYPE: d= avetaht
US Tel: 1-239-829-5608
http://the-edge.blogspot.com
--90e6ba6e89d8af5db104a86eb8f6--