From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-iy0-f171.google.com (mail-iy0-f171.google.com [209.85.210.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E3BC20224E; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 10:35:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by iaen33 with SMTP id n33so3802043iae.16 for ; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 10:35:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=JAmayMvt1wg4Tv5daLrcGQPb3+qOtZZMVs7cLWXOxnc=; b=rmrpD4/9ho0QLCPdgEBud5QOpVXwoDRLbBf2dOQ5CP7SWDMmvmHrZWkK5vJjOm62DS zefsTRYgbHPfpAkxlCK3LIjcK5HpP91qBvOpI6cegGgZF3yQwBafOVBW1ZWB9AKpg1Lk qbTRP51nKz/Vk0VmvQNkXYMxK1DFaqTVrbLww= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.43.132.201 with SMTP id hv9mr9404764icc.42.1322764532789; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 10:35:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.153.65 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 10:35:32 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 19:35:32 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: cerowrt related mailing lists created From: Dave Taht To: bloat-devel , bloat Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers working on AQM, device drivers, and networking stacks" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 18:35:33 -0000 I have created cerowrt-users, cerowrt-devel, and cerowrt-commits mailing lists on http://lists.bufferbloat.net Please subscribe to one or more of those if the cerowrt test router subproj= ect is your interest. I note also you can submit bug reports and comments dire= ctly into the 'cerowrt' user on lists.bufferbloat.net and they will automagically enter the bug system there. For now I plan to keep using the #bufferbloat channel for cerowrt support unless that gets out of hand too. I will periodically point out news of import regarding cerowrt and as relat= ing to bufferbloat to multiple lists here, but let's keep stuff that mostly cerowrt and not bloat related over there, ok? If anyone has any other suggestions for useful lists to create, now is the time to ask. One of my thoughts was to resurrect the old lartc list, which discussed user issues with traffic shaping and control in particular. It was useful in it's heyday and there seems to be some market for the idea re-occurring. There has been some talk of doing that instead over on vger.kernel.org, and I'm cool with that, if it happens. comments? --=20 Dave T=E4ht SKYPE: davetaht US Tel: 1-239-829-5608 FR Tel: 0638645374 http://www.bufferbloat.net