From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-iy0-f171.google.com (mail-iy0-f171.google.com [209.85.210.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78D01200627; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 18:57:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by iyi12 with SMTP id 12so3196635iyi.16 for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 19:35:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Fu9pQXoEJuyBiwe1CbOq4629NWeDFfg2Xrb42dhbivo=; b=bfhI9wSgwo5NZdSbB3AKcqdh3Qz/3i7JdvMTiHOq1hOqmghqwDJ9pAA/SrUvLoJpMi R9vbq1qtmnnMf37uXrdpRzEe+wkx2QRrkjuwG9Zj6rrotTMlJR0b9krq4wV8Z0p5tYtY K5rLqvKDNnb/OJN4W5alfc5AsN/pgXBDnU4/A= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.115.202 with SMTP id l10mr1590110icq.375.1310870143863; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 19:35:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.75.197 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 19:35:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 02:35:43 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Fwd: No rc-1 this weekend From: Dave Taht To: bismark-bootcamp@projectbismark.net, bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net, bloat-devel Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf303ea5ba458c0a04a83abdf1 X-BeenThere: bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers working on AQM, device drivers, and networking stacks" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 01:57:07 -0000 --20cf303ea5ba458c0a04a83abdf1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It is to my deep regret that I do not feel this release is baked enough to call a release candidate. I need to get back home, to my own lab, to take a look at it. The principal problem I'm having is that the GigE wan port appears to be malfunctioning in multiple ways, at GigE speeds. I have been able, under heavy load, to crash the wan port, at gigE speeds, with a variety of tests. However, today's build IS pretty good otherwise, and YOUR APPS BUILT, and WORK! IF, and only IF, your cable modem or dsl connection port is 100Mbit, rather than GigE, would I recomend you try this build as your main home router. http://huchra.bufferbloat.net/~cerowrt/cerowrt-wndr3700/ However, *please* feel free to hack on it inside of your own lan. There's lots of cool stuff on it, as noted elsewhere. More news as it happens. Good night, and good luck. --=20 Dave T=E4ht SKYPE: davetaht US Tel: 1-239-829-5608 http://the-edge.blogspot.com --=20 Dave T=E4ht SKYPE: davetaht US Tel: 1-239-829-5608 http://the-edge.blogspot.com --20cf303ea5ba458c0a04a83abdf1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
It is to my deep regret that I do not feel t= his release is baked enough to call a release candidate.

I need to g= et back home, to my own lab, to take a look at it. The principal problem I&= #39;m having is that the
GigE wan port appears to be malfunctioning in multiple ways, at GigE speeds= .=A0

I have been able, under heavy load, to crash the wan port, at = gigE speeds, with a variety of tests.

However, today's build IS = pretty good otherwise, and YOUR APPS BUILT, and WORK!

IF, and only IF, your cable modem or dsl connection port is 100Mbit, ra= ther than GigE, would I recomend you try this build
as your main home r= outer.

http://huchra.bufferbloat.net/~cerowrt/cerowrt-= wndr3700/

However, *please* feel free to hack on it inside of your own lan. There= 's lots of cool stuff on it,
as noted elsewhere.

More news a= s it happens. Good night, and good luck.


--
Dave T=E4ht
SKYPE: davetaht
US Tel: 1-239-829-5608
http://the-edge.blogspot.com



--
Dave T=E4ht
SKYPE: davetah= t
US Tel: 1-239-829-5608
http://the-edge.blogspot.com
--20cf303ea5ba458c0a04a83abdf1--