Historic archive of defunct list bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Azin Neishaboori <azin.neishaboori@gmail.com>
To: George Lambert <marchon@gmail.com>,
	 "bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
	<bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: contradictory WiFi flent results
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 02:54:18 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADXq5+8jh+N2cjfNTU20ZcryWdFKKDmQKFUQGHStBtq=TRPO3g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC938Dj7P5JxyiPFar1NFqvJpd1hadNZwGgoMghfV-PUaRHp8g@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2668 bytes --]

Hi George
Thank you for your reply and helpful comments. You are right. There are too
many players at hand on my setup’s datapath.

I will try to set up more controlled experiments.

Thanks
Best
Azin

On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 12:24 AM George Lambert <marchon@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have been on this list for a long time, but I don't normally respond.
>
> With that said, you should keep in mind that when you are using a VM /
> there is a software IP stack that is touching and playing with your
> packets.
>
> I would consider if it is easy to try the following to give yourself a
> more controlled test environment.
>
> 1. run a USB OS without a VM on raw metal to remove the extra network
> routing stacks
> 2. directly cable into your router to eliminate any potential "802.11"
> interference from other devices and neighbors
> 3. see if you get the same/similar results
> 4. For optimal test results - PowerCycle your router to be sure that it
> has freshly reset it's memory -
> 5. Do a traceroute to see if your connection is experiencing any
> interference / packetloss in the route between yourself and the remote
> server.
>
> George -
> ps: If you would like to google hangout or zoom.us to check the
> configuration / I could spend a few minutes with you.
>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 11:25 PM Azin Neishaboori <
> azin.neishaboori@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear all
>> I have some contradictory results on my WiFi link. I run flent's rrul
>> test using several bufferbloat mitigation algorithms, and see that,
>> compared to FQ_codel, TCP BBR, etc., a simple prioritized ACK works the
>> best. Why is that I have no idea. I also am not clear as to why using BBR
>> on the client end increases the download throughput, but not upload (still
>> doing worse than prioritized ACK on cubic in download anyway). Attached
>> please see the plot.
>> What am I missing?
>>
>> My setup is pretty simple. I am on WiFi on my PC, and run flent on an
>> Ubuntu VM on a virtual machine, and connect to netperf.bufferbloat.net.
>> All configurations are done on my VM end of course.
>>
>> Any help/hint would be appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks a lot
>> Best
>> Azin
>>
> _______________________________________________
>> Bloat-devel mailing list
>> Bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat-devel
>>
>
>
> --
> P THINK BEFORE PRINTING: is it really necessary?
>
> This e-mail and its attachments are confidential and solely for the
> intended addressee(s). Do not share or use them without approval. If
> received in error, contact the sender
> and delete them.
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3993 bytes --]

      parent reply	other threads:[~2019-01-18  7:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-18  4:25 Azin Neishaboori
2019-01-18  6:27 ` Jonathan Morton
2019-01-18  8:05   ` Azin Neishaboori
2019-01-18  8:14     ` Jonathan Morton
     [not found] ` <CAC938Dj7P5JxyiPFar1NFqvJpd1hadNZwGgoMghfV-PUaRHp8g@mail.gmail.com>
2019-01-18  7:54   ` Azin Neishaboori [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CADXq5+8jh+N2cjfNTU20ZcryWdFKKDmQKFUQGHStBtq=TRPO3g@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=azin.neishaboori@gmail.com \
    --cc=bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=marchon@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox