From: Azin Neishaboori <azin.neishaboori@gmail.com>
To: bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: BBR performance on LTE
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 17:00:08 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADXq5+9=hLsWjeS2NVjY6Widpb0PgzrgxCMdJeNkfraDgd37yg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1100 bytes --]
Dear all
I know I have already asked a question recently. But I hope you consider
reading this question:
Consider the following setup: I have a laptop connected on 100Mbps Ehternet
to a router equipped with an LTE SIM and antennas. I run flent tests on an
Ubuntu VM on my laptop.I am trying to assess/compare performance of
different algorithms on bufferbloat mitigation on LTE links. FQ_Codel when
applied, was applied on the router box itself directly.
The results for TCP BBR in any combination seem really underwhelming. I
turned BBR on on my VM manually, by going to /etc/sysctl.conf and adding
net.ipv4.tcp_congestion_control=bbr and net.core.default_qdisc=fq. Then I
issue a sysctl -p to refresh.
I ran flent rrul test, and also in some tests used netem to induce packet
loss. With or without induced loss, BBR still underperformed. Attached
please see the graphs. Is this expected? Has anyone seen something like
this? I would really appreciate any insight you might have into this.
Thanks a lot
Best
Azin
[image: image.png]
Here is with induced loss (1%, 2% and 4%):
[image: image.png]
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1497 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: image.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 121929 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: image.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 126409 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2019-01-18 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-18 22:00 Azin Neishaboori [this message]
2019-01-22 15:39 ` Azin Neishaboori
2019-01-22 21:07 ` Dave Taht
2019-01-22 21:59 ` Azin Neishaboori
2019-01-22 22:00 ` Dave Taht
2019-01-22 22:27 ` [Bloat] " Sebastian Moeller
2019-01-22 22:31 ` Azin Neishaboori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CADXq5+9=hLsWjeS2NVjY6Widpb0PgzrgxCMdJeNkfraDgd37yg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=azin.neishaboori@gmail.com \
--cc=bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox