From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ia0-x22a.google.com (mail-ia0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c02::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C818D21F1C5 for ; Wed, 8 May 2013 04:06:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ia0-f170.google.com with SMTP id k20so1851375iak.29 for ; Wed, 08 May 2013 04:06:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=GRqbaL31SyByOTC/Mo1glYKQQ8cOHjcxl8X+lE0F5E4=; b=MZEzVhiZD5hF9EZlqTyfNoRptKO7hPdfKBH9P8GEp6f/0grIzkFISXqbVtwwJGjF34 cCtjiFSEPwLJj9pCFE9jp2vPRyNJ5Uncs/ce3iqYZPHzsAHx5m0AuGdmMwRwTW7fDb23 UaMVh+SXhYdOTZfkht49K/5So7/66D0kzxXyIvMtWC/UUBDtIoLAQbSvFKusUFY1VSSY jVvEMfaqM/6nWYMsSZ/LhZ8hN1cjo2IML4jTgSeQjSJ+uL3hAKyblqj67AHDudWCTlnE nhFA2uowdlOZ36Y9MsHRHx/LeRtTLiIsaV9tJXc+ygFoa5FH3SdAbGO2KrXBb34fengG 44tg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=GRqbaL31SyByOTC/Mo1glYKQQ8cOHjcxl8X+lE0F5E4=; b=OmvLbhVXTlzKf/7PR3hBXJ1SUHhIIJ2QU4YjAvMarNbT/evRa4gc9oM6MOvX/6oN8K Sho2WFoHnrVao/bgFomY9+0SEo6dsvU7Lj2g2iTisNDCZrIMPsSIJR+00gyuTR25X4dt 7CKVDwPLKBWwSem4yCY7utJx+3sV0TiWDAz8Uo3eDOPpMGofuTO2SMJH5cS1oYrkMFHI dhem1xuCFZwfKlFqVEwc8s9d4FEsiXXhxFWYMcLtMTK0b1ZhX6k8Y1Ahuj4EGT+mDhJM ynGABAtopSkl3m6utiNakTTBVANyG9zTh80BD6abbnhX8geOMt02AjrUdc3XCYixkWHL J2aQ== X-Received: by 10.50.170.36 with SMTP id aj4mr2250428igc.4.1368011199160; Wed, 08 May 2013 04:06:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.237.148 with HTTP; Wed, 8 May 2013 04:06:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3c2ea3e2-a587-4cf6-820b-929e6d75a9ad@email.android.com> References: <87vc6vgghx.wl%jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <8F7177E4-6212-4A74-8A7C-A2D1703A59BF@iki.fi> <87sj1zgfot.wl%jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <518A1F51.809@openwrt.org> <3c2ea3e2-a587-4cf6-820b-929e6d75a9ad@email.android.com> From: Lorenzo Colitti Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 20:06:19 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [homenet] Source-specific routes in Linux [was: atomic updates...] To: Steven Barth Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f234a5193a2ae04dc32ed8b X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlJOdlllKQiUHCcmVXFyEFO5uHfdrVxVQjEHzBXRCJADl18yKsQs6P4h6rHWf/ITYkVqATYK4zH1r6a5M7cr7a7+lDdhs7OzJa12HaAFxDHIkbXNUpKPeKI5RDuhgxSZdKqmFANGyb8scU3r9TfJZlzQzCleWTSEdKJEI+D3SOJMbZs3SD0wwZDJachf3Sf3Czm6Z1fj6UM4ZkkqT1844vHXqTTXg== X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 09 May 2013 02:16:43 -0700 Cc: bloat-devel , Juliusz Chroboczek , Markus Stenberg , Ole Troan , boutier@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr, "homenet@ietf.org" X-BeenThere: bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers working on AQM, device drivers, and networking stacks" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 11:06:40 -0000 --e89a8f234a5193a2ae04dc32ed8b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Steven Barth wrote: > if there would be multiple routers which I guess is unlikely in that > situation. One could maybe attribute the prefix to the source address of > the DHCPv6 server but that sounds problematic to me aswell. > So you're talking about the case where you have ISP1 and ISP2 "plugged into a switch together with your router"? In that case I can't see any better way than attempting to match the link-local IPv6 address that you got the RA from to the link-local address of the DHCPv6 server you got the PD from. I can't think of a situation why these would be different, but perhaps there is. Can the DHCPv6 server be a global address? --e89a8f234a5193a2ae04dc32ed8b Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Steven Barth <cyrus@openw= rt.org> wrote:
if there would be multiple routers which I guess is unlikely in t= hat situation. One could maybe attribute the prefix to the source address o= f the DHCPv6 server but that sounds problematic to me aswell.

So you're talking about the case= where you have ISP1 and ISP2 "plugged into a switch together with you= r router"?

In that case I can'= ;t see any better way than attempting to match the link-local IPv6 address = that you got the RA from to the link-local address of the DHCPv6 server you= got the PD from.

I can't think of a situation why these = would be different, but perhaps there is. Can the DHCPv6 server be a global= address?
--e89a8f234a5193a2ae04dc32ed8b--