From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <davehart@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ww0-f47.google.com (mail-ww0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CAC8200627;
	Sat, 16 Jul 2011 20:57:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wwf27 with SMTP id 27so2105872wwf.28
	for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 21:36:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=KYWmDCH+PYdc1ze4H8gBk0U5EAAdZGIE5EEBQ5EwOPs=;
	b=aadHsvH6q/4etzlI7Hm4LbHwy7MKdpr3VTTVpBCPZWGZaI6sDILpXTp1RTWJlSS3Vi
	u9PWVCJLf6slpe3yOpfWdimips/hwUiitcP2vlo7AkaNVmkuLviVG/1mf1D68ON2977W
	JlXmiXonzj5J1PbeW/Puv4eACDsxzmr1LaqLQ=
Received: by 10.227.12.20 with SMTP id v20mr4514597wbv.42.1310877367097; Sat,
	16 Jul 2011 21:36:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: davehart@gmail.com
Received: by 10.227.41.200 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 21:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E2226B3.3070907@hp.com>
References: <CAA93jw6CaJ7LAF58HHXQt=tQd1DYXRrNUCrM-gd5JhTKJs0K8g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMbSiYDp3A7LVp1yNaBZNTTe+OuzyMiGrGzBqNrd13dpgSUd+g@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E2226B3.3070907@hp.com>
From: Dave Hart <davehart_gmail_exchange_tee@davehart.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 04:35:47 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7OKeOWmA0FSom_Rjad1TrxlZE94
Message-ID: <CAMbSiYBFNteUdRhBH2CgPL-SOEA2_DPgymK9VPHM_gAPYH=TVA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: smoketest #6 of cerowrt is go for testing
To: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: bismark-bootcamp@projectbismark.net,
	bloat-devel <bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-BeenThere: bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developers working on AQM, device drivers,
	and networking stacks" <bloat-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat-devel>,
	<mailto:bloat-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat-devel>,
	<mailto:bloat-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 03:57:30 -0000

On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 00:02 UTC, Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com> wrote:
> If you configure ntpd with bare IP addresses rather than names, will the
> getaddrinfo() return without attempting any DNS in the first place?

Yes, basically.  ntpd might not even call getaddrinfo() in that case
(it may use inet_pton() or similar to convert the IP address to binary
representation).  At any rate, using only numeric IPv4 or IPv6
addresses will avoid any DNS lookups.

Cheers,
Dave Hart