From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Authentication-Results: mail.toke.dk; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=; dkim=pass header.d=proton.me; arc=none (Message is not ARC signed); dmarc=pass (Used From Domain Record) header.from=proton.me policy.dmarc=quarantine
Received: from mail-106102.protonmail.ch (mail-106102.protonmail.ch [79.135.106.102])
	by mail.toke.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE82885498A
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Mon, 27 Oct 2025 17:54:10 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=proton.me;
	s=protonmail; t=1761584048; x=1761843248;
	bh=TxdK4K5Type58lPIFkRafx6oKbcdUmorA8ceUOclPWA=;
	h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:
	 Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:
	 Message-ID:BIMI-Selector;
	b=DNI6ZjPnLffYcSkp8sknYvvZ59Z4NeGCOVcl4w73ylqYVpJqCYL5wFJ+1NZQgzDvc
	 hQF09PJTd/0xJ8WMl1EvH6CdysbiD2aqR/1pHoqV/nqZEQ3aAxRQzdkl6GK9fuLafn
	 4KjHS4GuL3f3khQ5sSOxS2+r89QetcIuPlK6xuafx5SS1dydWp5QS7htRDS00c2T1p
	 X1WVJWwe4qjGyVE6VkbJG1cS3VtQ7S18co8ojQOKvxzsFRS26SB8NiMADEH+RZGmU7
	 Zl7P/E3JlsHRfO0TSnAGqtBrPEjY0gyZT2i/x8NuPPFg+85xWnDaCzvcyrtb8FEE/o
	 khQ0vRvH5XKAg==
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 16:54:03 +0000
To: Rich Brown <richb.hanover@gmail.com>
From: Eric <evil.function@proton.me>
Cc: Rich Brown via Bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Message-ID: <-VaUY0C96Y7FEO6D1ewDWjig_2r_WttxUzz_qcz3BAk30RmmqtNFXwdwLef9wbe2SUeps2YGuw5i4YLAyksIfPukrXQMcml5dvqBp99qbzk=@proton.me>
In-Reply-To: <277398AE-EB13-422B-B645-DEAA62C8D312@gmail.com>
References: <277398AE-EB13-422B-B645-DEAA62C8D312@gmail.com>
Feedback-ID: 48716100:user:proton
X-Pm-Message-ID: b0620b52ec3f0c480fe57577798668881765faab
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID-Hash: CEI7ZFOYUCGLPZETSP7YZZMNXU4HHIGX
X-Message-ID-Hash: CEI7ZFOYUCGLPZETSP7YZZMNXU4HHIGX
X-MailFrom: evil.function@proton.me
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
Subject: [Bloat] Re: Cutie Network Quality Test now in alpha-test
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
Archived-At: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/bloat/-VaUY0C96Y7FEO6D1ewDWjig_2r_WttxUzz_qcz3BAk30RmmqtNFXwdwLef9wbe2SUeps2YGuw5i4YLAyksIfPukrXQMcml5dvqBp99qbzk=@proton.me/>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/bloat/>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:bloat-owner@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:bloat-join@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:bloat-leave@lists.bufferbloat.net>

On Monday, October 27th, 2025 at 07:47, Rich Brown <richb.hanover@gmail.com=
> wrote:

> With some trepidation (and a little bit of pride), I announce the Cutie n=
etwork quality test. Inspired by the VSee Network Stability Test, Cutie is =
a completely new implementation of that concept that establishes a WebRTC c=
onnection to its backend server, then uses the RTC stream (10 messages per =
second) to measure and chart latency, jitter, and packet loss.
>=20
> You can try the demo site at: netperf.bufferbloat.net:5173 http://netperf=
.bufferbloat.net:5173/ or you can install Cutie on a local server to test y=
our own network.
>=20
>=20
> There=E2=80=99s lots more information in the Github repo at: https://gith=
ub.com/richb-hanover/Cutie-Network-Quality-Test

Hey Rich,

Are you ready to list it on Sebastian's testing thread?

https://forum.openwrt.org/t/2025-current-recommendations-for-bufferbloat-te=
sting/241303

Eric