From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from complete.lackof.org (complete.lackof.org [198.49.126.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 831A53B2A4 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 01:14:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [172.16.1.4] (97-113-201-146.tukw.qwest.net [97.113.201.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by complete.lackof.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8D64A33E02D7 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 23:14:06 -0600 (MDT) To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net References: <431A84397F3D9C1EB097BCCE@[172.27.17.193]> <6F1F3C646A7DFD2CC8C9E79E@172.27.17.193> From: Matt Taggart Message-ID: <045c1c9b-7da8-7a59-8d9f-b681593be20f@lackof.org> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 22:15:27 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.1 at complete.lackof.org X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on complete.lackof.org Subject: Re: [Bloat] this explains speedtest stuff X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 05:14:07 -0000 On 4/23/20 6:20 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 6:17 PM Kenneth Porter wrote: >> >> --On Friday, April 24, 2020 4:47 AM +0300 Jonathan Morton >> wrote: >> >>> It looks like there was a websockets error during the test, so try it >>> again and it might work. >> >> This time I got an A score. >> >> >> >> I'm using OpenWrt 18.06.4 on a Zyxel NBG6716 with the piece_of_cake.qos >> queue setup script. > > That is still oscillating more than I would expect. Do you have docsis > framing enabled? if you are doing nat, nat? ISP is Comcast in this case. In the past I have always gotten exactly the rates in the service plan, I think because the neighborhood was properly built-out and the modem itself was doing the limiting. But... Today I was running betterspeedtest.sh on a Comcast link with 125/12 service and I was getting results like 98/12, 75/12. I think the quarantine is really resulting in lot more download use, that might also explain the variability in the download (note the upload is pretty consistent). -- Matt Taggart matt@lackof.org