From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mailgw1.uni-kl.de (mailgw1.uni-kl.de [IPv6:2001:638:208:120::220]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77CD03B29D for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 23:11:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [172.20.10.2] (dynamic-046-114-001-019.46.114.pool.telefonica.de [46.114.1.19]) (authenticated bits=0) by mailgw1.uni-kl.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id 14R3BfAS031305 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 27 May 2021 05:11:49 +0200 To: Mark Andrews Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net References: <7FBA3F6F-CBA1-4B19-B48F-10927EDA17A9@gmail.com> From: Erik Auerswald Message-ID: <06534668-fd89-5dbf-f1e3-94de5bfa6ea0@unix-ag.uni-kl.de> Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 05:11:41 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.398, tests=KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.398, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 X-Spam-Score: (0.398) X-Spam-Flag: NO Subject: Re: [Bloat] Educate colleges on tcp vs udp X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 03:11:59 -0000 Hi Mark, On 27.05.21 00:44, Mark Andrews wrote: >> On 24 May 2021, at 04:47, Erik Auerswald wrote: >> Especially if the response needs to be larger than the request, >> e.g., with DNS, a response rate limit should be applied. > > DNS supports authentication of clients, be it DNS COOKIE, TSIG or > SIG(0). If your DNS clients are not using one of these you should > contact the vendor and request a update. Most modern DNS server software, including ISC's BIND, implements response rate limiting. Thanks, Erik