From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ed1-x529.google.com (mail-ed1-x529.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::529]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CC813B29E for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 02:16:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x529.google.com with SMTP id f4-v6so2404211edq.3 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 23:16:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6/x/+VC8ylzasql15txDJkcYd6gOj7dymZg1kZ3NIVM=; b=flg4fAwQmnpDJSLEiV1bHv1ZYFumpQD3fvmHDGqk6TN/8aKQ7zJg72r02CYeFBubDC vbJod88hgnvAJPAOB6SbI7kron2woXDJSDgANYsfjb+k4LbOTS5xoxQEEy7VZPCWCHJP +mnGVRB5lTiGQrikw7hAtjY7zlT19Y5zXnDhHrYC9zdZ2kgJx+yyt+Bsn8eMLmkrvymI /meKOiJvqmFHlBB/FuguIDbd8Pwx7u+O6KS8E3gxYHrbjNfVVI3Z4PIc7FZuRJsCd6D3 hAsV8i80qomKUY8keUn5KmNvmDmNsTsesvbigrnoPiNaiSRO0CQljtKLtJoXf2Wa/Vo6 /zZg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=6/x/+VC8ylzasql15txDJkcYd6gOj7dymZg1kZ3NIVM=; b=b5LUwnl3rsDZzUI9oojNLDEl09v5paZw3OOunjYeaA/XyZVAZi2Lgz8jMhhD0JnL3m X95Uck7xFlnoVkWtvxvQKavMNy5askZOlyAYZ0h/p0V/57xc7+rbEyFdIf1QMPRgyC6H qO8CXmeqDd4kK6AC+xXEkGKDj4Ac9RdEwIddhPN/9CPEe3YN3JSVEiZMtxRxOBtO3vAn Rl8uF00hBUJgjO6ScKqID0jp7Z7GkLTpb8IXnWJSOh7Asb6bU1blhimBTaEnQslTCq/t Djvdlemm0EC/5MjF2ONps+3GsSOF7JkTCQzR9VCtUsuFR7GRlJPrXGv7hyL29osh3ZxI s3CQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51DMDOFdHtuO4jYR5cEbs0h5PtQp6pl3sn+AYiuFYzN5FeOXINkT 3nzTbfGGruofGLVGuneu7IOW5dSl X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdYFXz50J1bWfsJru1vHQwvNYZ50c/y62JCne0Q4ExcMVX5swzDEZR1vPRc7bTcd93Je8Sdztw== X-Received: by 2002:a50:fc90:: with SMTP id f16-v6mr906480edq.149.1535091380262; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 23:16:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zotac.xperim.be (46.25-240-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be. [81.240.25.46]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a33-v6sm1930665eda.2.2018.08.23.23.16.19 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 23 Aug 2018 23:16:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.184] (bajor.xperim.be [192.168.1.184]) by zotac.xperim.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4D39F497928; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 08:16:18 +0200 (CEST) To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net References: <66e2374b-f998-b132-410e-46c9089bb06b@gmail.com> <360212B1-8411-4ED0-877A-92E59070F518@gmx.de> <7D711CA2-892C-4D0B-AE68-31703EBBBF3E@gmx.de> From: Jan Ceuleers Message-ID: <0d937b41-4f43-f89e-d30b-a0716556060f@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 08:16:18 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7D711CA2-892C-4D0B-AE68-31703EBBBF3E@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Bloat] [Cerowrt-devel] beating the drum for BQL X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 06:16:21 -0000 On 24/08/18 01:35, Sebastian Moeller wrote: > Sure, but my ISP charged 4 EUR per month for the DSL-router that adds up to 12*2*4 = 96 EUR over the 2 years contract duration and to 12*5*4 = 240 over my renting duration; assuming that my ISP does not need to make a profit on this device (after all I am renting this to be able to consume internet and telephone from them) that is considerably more that 20-40 EUR. This is especially farcical since until a few years ago the dsl-routers have been given for "free" and when they switched to mandatory renting the baseplan price was not reduced by the same amount. I guess what I want to convey is while cost is imprtant it is not a goo d excuse to distribute underpowered devices.... A few points: 1. The CPE makers sell these devices to ISPs wholesale. The price point they have to design to is determined by those ISPs' willingness to pay, which is also influenced/co-determined by the market price. What ISPs manage to rake in over the technical life span of those devices has nothing to do with it - the CPE makers don't get a cut of the rental charges. The economics explain the behaviour of both the ISP and the CPE maker very well - nothing's going to change without some substantial disruption. 2. Mandatory rental of CPE is a racket that's seen in various markets (e.g. STBs in the cable market). It is more defendable in some situations than in others. For example cable companies get away with it because of a lack of sufficient standardisation (which is also not going to be improved to the point where the STB market can be completely opened because the standards are set by a cable industry body). It's not so defendable in the DSL market anymore, although I can tell you from experience that there's a lot of very poor DSL modems out there which cause interop problems in the real world, including interference with other people's DSL lines. The network operator having firm control of which DSL modems are permitted onto their network helps performance for all of their customers. But this can also be achieved by means other than mandatory rental of CPE: there are countries where the regulator oversees a DSL modem certification scheme, and end-users can then go out and buy a certified device through their preferred retail outlet, at very reasonable prices. FWIW I bought three STBs for 50EUR from my cable company 5 years ago, rather than renting them for 7EUR/month each. 3. ISPs and network operators will buy the cheapest CPE that meets their needs. In respect of traffic throughput they will invariably use Ookla to test. This is why I've been saying for quite some time that unless we can convince Ookla to penalise bufferbloat we won't make a dent in how CPE are designed in this respect. Jan