General list for discussing Bufferbloat
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bloat] Pie not fully implementable on tofino p4
@ 2021-04-21  2:42 Dave Taht
  2021-04-21 16:07 ` Ralf Kundel
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dave Taht @ 2021-04-21  2:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bloat, codel

https://www.comsys.rwth-aachen.de/fileadmin/papers/2021/2021-kunze-aqm-tofino-p4.pdf

For a codel comparison, see:

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2010.04528v1.pdf

Where the authors show that fq_codel is feasible on the PISA platform...

but a direct comparison between the two papers is not possible. What I
don't understand about the above paper is how codel timestamps are
passed from ingress to egress.

-- 
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public
relations, for Mother Nature cannot be fooled" - Richard Feynman

dave@taht.net <Dave Täht> CTO, TekLibre, LLC Tel: 1-831-435-0729

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bloat] Pie not fully implementable on tofino p4
  2021-04-21  2:42 [Bloat] Pie not fully implementable on tofino p4 Dave Taht
@ 2021-04-21 16:07 ` Ralf Kundel
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ralf Kundel @ 2021-04-21 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dave Taht, bloat, codel

Hi,

regarding the question: how timestamps come from ingress to egress pipe?

Well this depends (on the P4 abstraction) on the P4 version you use. As
far as I remember (it is a long time ago) in P4_14 metadata (which can
store the timestamp) are handed over implicitly from ingress to egress.
In P4_16 you have do do this explicitly in the Deparser of Ingress and
Parser of Egress: Simply said you just write the timestamp before the
Ethernet header. You can see this here in line 64 to 80:
https://github.com/ralfkundel/p4-codel/blob/master/targets/tofino/srcP4/l1switchCodel.p4


best,
Ralf

Am 21.04.21 um 04:42 schrieb Dave Taht:
> https://www.comsys.rwth-aachen.de/fileadmin/papers/2021/2021-kunze-aqm-tofino-p4.pdf
>
> For a codel comparison, see:
>
> https://arxiv.org/pdf/2010.04528v1.pdf
>
> Where the authors show that fq_codel is feasible on the PISA platform...
>
> but a direct comparison between the two papers is not possible. What I
> don't understand about the above paper is how codel timestamps are
> passed from ingress to egress.
>
-- 
________________________________________________

Ralf Kundel, M.Sc.

Technical University of Darmstadt
Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology Multimedia Communications Lab (KOM)
Adaptive Communication Systems Group (ACS)

Postal address: TU Darmstadt, FB 18, KOM, Rundeturmstr. 10, 64283 Darmstadt, Germany
Location: S3|20 - 216
Tel: +49 6151 16-20855
Email: Ralf.Kundel@kom.tu-darmstadt.de
Web: http://www.kom.tu-darmstadt.de
___________________________________________________________


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-04-21 16:07 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-04-21  2:42 [Bloat] Pie not fully implementable on tofino p4 Dave Taht
2021-04-21 16:07 ` Ralf Kundel

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox