From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk1-x72d.google.com (mail-qk1-x72d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C30543B29E for ; Sat, 7 Nov 2020 16:22:21 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-qk1-x72d.google.com with SMTP id v143so18819qkb.2 for ; Sat, 07 Nov 2020 13:22:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:message-id:date :to; bh=4zq9RnWuBKV6tay86pYxG56g3VqVhunw+cdjj6xCxhM=; b=FspOeDqvHsmp1IBkRqfLeXdhikWd892Jv0NmaC0lFpViakMqoYkaoOGEy1IPRWpS3x m2i8YNk1YDNsbiqCV88aNPXqO/RCteiyLkhZ/aUHwqiFw0ihBKijE6Czk1eutojNAKBI Bcp43bGuGaDdlfxIInJsgJso+tPdaUoZQsCrhnUMCk6UmC8F24wisVUqjXN8BIqflEJO 5smkVDKPXgR9BG6G6MXvCn+O1uv/IVDHlV73G8Pus4v339cdRuCcRjPBL4g1un2f+OP7 CCs7gmTPAyyIPOiCAdT5HhFp+TFK8wtpyU2Uf+OWe/Qowi7xupPFWqpkdjS1vSKaIrr5 sEng== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:message-id:date:to; bh=4zq9RnWuBKV6tay86pYxG56g3VqVhunw+cdjj6xCxhM=; b=l5YUTw8gOSQoSMSc8wRUg92/uVRSI0nqwnW15pdvSfKqXC7tV8MMEiOTQ0ia3C5F2B mh3uqdY7773unuUvj4lyip8yikpfb/44u+di3BjrnoY55GanX28EFjBlhBcvJkB3udWM rrDUFS/ojFvm/LURK8NKvCyyCca5B1Yw6KBen+hq0AmFVOI6/K9rdTr5fqd+kYQNNhgN UNFkYvjWZI277r0zUPb06W0yWI0gwd9+8IbSlSNJIuH5khRwU0UQbjC66dumO4mhPJtl hgQWkwIdhVb+nV9hXp7k0zUgdL2PCXhsiVnHb+m/EMdN87T/wY/ktP3lq0yLOqdUIiXo cvnQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531tH5jeMvzC5+/aYGEKYPgYy+CM1rhDjT3a/k4UjA6/Rg15u9jU A8eLFwm2WeMH7RANcHGuAGKVhqUtPbsRyg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzEEDiwA1R1Q2ij9CgQiXfsPD/4l20/5P1SSFJC1viXv1nY6Cr17nsmMp8JKw5XWC3OKPVD6g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:718:: with SMTP id 24mr2744716qkc.388.1604784141134; Sat, 07 Nov 2020 13:22:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from richs-mbp-pro.lan ([70.16.104.95]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t14sm2978989qta.20.2020.11.07.13.22.20 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 07 Nov 2020 13:22:20 -0800 (PST) From: Rich Brown Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\)) Message-Id: <10D5F8A3-A1E1-4F46-9BA7-21EA34FC3D9D@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2020 16:22:19 -0500 To: bloat X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4) Subject: Re: [Bloat] We built a new bufferbloat test and keen for feedback X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2020 21:22:21 -0000 It's great that you're tackling this problem. In addition to various = speed test websites, it's worth comparing your results to the other = tests we use for measuring bufferbloat. You probably know about these, = but I figured I would list them for completeness: 1) Flent.org - the gold standard that provides repeatable, measurable = results. See also the RRUL Chart Explanation for Cliff Notes about how = to read the resulting plots. = https://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/RRUL_Chart_Explanation/ 2) betterspeedtest.sh - an easy-to-run script that fires off a ping = test, then runs netperf to generate upload and download traffic. = https://github.com/richb-hanover/OpenWrtScripts#betterspeedtestsh Since these are not web-based, their results may not match yours, = although it would be good to be able to explain differences. Best regards, Rich Brown=