From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jf@jonathanfoulkes.com>
Received: from smtp78.ord1d.emailsrvr.com (smtp78.ord1d.emailsrvr.com
 [184.106.54.78])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04E573B29D
 for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 10:18:02 -0500 (EST)
X-Auth-ID: jf@jonathanfoulkes.com
Received: by smtp18.relay.ord1d.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender:
 jf-AT-jonathanfoulkes.com) with ESMTPSA id 3E22FA01A8; 
 Thu, 11 Mar 2021 10:18:02 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
From: Jonathan Foulkes <jf@jonathanfoulkes.com>
In-Reply-To: <61D93E89625B74F2A5ED5CFE@[172.27.17.193]>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 10:18:01 -0500
Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <11B009B3-076E-4F19-8FF8-E378D1CE5EF6@jonathanfoulkes.com>
References: <61D93E89625B74F2A5ED5CFE@[172.27.17.193]>
To: Kenneth Porter <shiva@sewingwitch.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
X-Classification-ID: c774afd5-7e77-44d4-80f6-4549c4eb8ec7-1-1
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Meeting software continues to ignore the bloat issue
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 15:18:03 -0000

Sad, but at least Teams does make use of DSCP, but for Windows users a =
lot more effort is required.

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoftteams/qos-in-teams

BTW- sounds like they do not mark in the app by default, unlike their =
MacOS app, or even the Zoom app on Windows. On Windows if you run the =
Zoom app as admin traffic will be marked, since apps running with =
elevated privileges do not have the marks blanched.=20

> On Mar 10, 2021, at 11:52 PM, Kenneth Porter <shiva@sewingwitch.com> =
wrote:
>=20
> No mention of bloat here!
>=20
> =
<https://www.zdnet.com/article/microsoft-tackles-the-bandwidth-problem-for=
-remote-workers-using-teams/>
>=20
> Perhaps we can nudge this author to learn more?
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat