From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-x336.google.com (mail-wm1-x336.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::336]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11B833B29E for ; Sat, 7 Nov 2020 08:00:06 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-wm1-x336.google.com with SMTP id c9so3976053wml.5 for ; Sat, 07 Nov 2020 05:00:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=creamfinance.com; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version; bh=tw8shnZbDiQGYehMIf0o1w7GFRWaSJkzWTwuhqBMYAc=; b=PnZKztY21YLyp1fp5bQT5QOcDs4aJVHJCIbTlLgE7NXQAiXRakHM190uon+6ninO8Z Mn3esNIrng3MAFOU6XMUa7NF21Pomy3nm2bipx17k2gcYdR5F//vNgdIYatTgA5Nsrrz vwqs527V3q/Ebj83Q5AdlWMME4ggqD3CUvc9s= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version; bh=tw8shnZbDiQGYehMIf0o1w7GFRWaSJkzWTwuhqBMYAc=; b=Ty/d37uxS/5ELFLCVUmyH2aotPclAHoTq4z6ax2R7jpaqmK2neXTIZSf1NwiNB6/fX Zt/GeLCw7bhAxZ5mLFhGNXRqt+MGOzA0zo07EjzhZs/YZpIgydmaQU0BpuK2oT6Pq7ZI 1FbAmulLv5OO1leY9Tdc4QBB96ZEkf6TUZN/mMmtSvX8ROHonUT0IWveoOzRMoQdLD8S xs3ksguw2ne5NdEj0CT2Rbj/3dbcsnIrlqR9LVc8BcbbRDjPIhtBBadRQ87ElTcYlG13 HHbzJlkXD/sE3BgwV12G2/Q+XBCamMO+HY6XQoTGwtefXukK0ifUEuiV9ghq3RqEQ3hy v2ZQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532kLgCxw9Vz1x1/NYEA8WA4qlO7f61JBHKRtbp/JEe/QsPAzH/p 6BS9FS4Qv7n3jGZdtUb1/d0c X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzM9LSDyNi+pkjMWPavxR3VIqIEE0zAYqSq5EiXOhEaperYOT3E3y4uKyG9fhMmUUmEH1XYrQ== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c394:: with SMTP id s20mr4660778wmj.40.1604754005926; Sat, 07 Nov 2020 05:00:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.8.100.3] (ip-185.208.132.9.cf-it.at. [185.208.132.9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u6sm6304981wmj.40.2020.11.07.05.00.04 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 07 Nov 2020 05:00:05 -0800 (PST) From: "Thomas Rosenstein" To: "Jan Ceuleers" Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2020 14:00:04 +0100 X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.2r5673) Message-ID: <12D28386-7C00-4A31-91E4-37083C1674F9@creamfinance.com> In-Reply-To: <6963be0e-3eb5-5875-b53c-66033f50dc2d@gmail.com> References: <87imalumps.fsf@toke.dk> <871rh8vf1p.fsf@toke.dk> <81ED2A33-D366-42FC-9344-985FEE8F11BA@creamfinance.com> <87sg9ot5f1.fsf@toke.dk> <20201105143317.78276bbc@carbon> <11812D44-BD46-4CA4-BA39-6080BD88F163@creamfinance.com> <20201106121840.7959ae4b@carbon> <87blgaso84.fsf@toke.dk> <20201106135358.09f6c281@carbon> <20201106151324.5f506574@carbon> <1E70B6D2-1212-43FA-989A-03B657EEE2F2@creamfinance.com> <20201106211940.4c30ccc9@carbon> <6963be0e-3eb5-5875-b53c-66033f50dc2d@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Bloat] Router congestion, slow ping/ack times with kernel 5.4.60 X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2020 13:00:07 -0000 On 7 Nov 2020, at 13:40, Jan Ceuleers wrote: > On 07/11/2020 13:37, Thomas Rosenstein via Bloat wrote: >> Nonetheless, I tested it and no difference :) > > The relevant test would be to run your experiment while IPv6 is > completely disabled in the kernel. Tested with ipv6 full off (via ipv6.disable=1), no difference! Here's an extract from the ethtool https://pastebin.com/cabpWGFz just in case there's something hidden.