From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-22-ewr.dyndns.com (mxout-070-ewr.mailhop.org [216.146.33.70]) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7634A2E0271 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:25:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scan-21-ewr.mailhop.org (scan-21-ewr.local [10.0.141.243]) by mail-22-ewr.dyndns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92738304C7 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 23:25:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS X-Originating-IP: 15.192.0.46 Received: from g5t0009.atlanta.hp.com (g5t0009.atlanta.hp.com [15.192.0.46]) by mail-22-ewr.dyndns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D58930242 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 23:25:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from g5t0029.atlanta.hp.com (g5t0029.atlanta.hp.com [16.228.8.141]) by g5t0009.atlanta.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B41306C9; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 23:25:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [16.89.244.213] (tardy.cup.hp.com [16.89.244.213]) by g5t0029.atlanta.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 731A720089; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 23:25:44 +0000 (UTC) From: Rick Jones To: Jonathan Morton In-Reply-To: <59A2E37D-7CC7-408F-BF73-DBD4011A2066@gmail.com> References: <4D7F4121.40307@freedesktop.org> <20110315175942.GA10064@goldfish> <1300212877.2087.2155.camel@tardy> <20110315183111.GB2542@tuxdriver.com> <29B06777-CC5F-4802-8727-B04F58CDA9E3@gmail.com> <20110315205146.GF2542@tuxdriver.com> <219C7840-ED79-49EA-929D-96C5A6200401@gmail.com> <20110315151946.31e86b46@nehalam> <1300228592.2087.2191.camel@tardy> <1300229578.2565.29.camel@edumazet-laptop> <59A2E37D-7CC7-408F-BF73-DBD4011A2066@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:25:37 -0700 Message-ID: <1300231537.2087.2207.camel@tardy> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Stephen Hemminger , bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Bloat] Random idea in reaction to all the discussion of TCP flavours - timestamps? X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: rick.jones2@hp.com List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 23:25:50 -0000 > > Do the CPUs in handhelds possess that much more "oomph" > > than "regular" systems did when 100BT or 1GbE first appeared? > > Typical handhelds now have anything from a 600MHz ARM11 (iPhone 3G) up > to dual-core 1GHz+ Cortex-A9s (iPad2, Galaxy Tab). The latter are > roughly equivalent to decent netbook/nettop hardware. There is > typically 512MB RAM in total. Pity that isn't enough memory to run SPECcpu2006 to take us out of the mythical megahurts space :) But it might be enough to run SPECcpu2000... rick jones