From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wy0-f171.google.com (mail-wy0-f171.google.com
	[74.125.82.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6555B200A92
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Wed,  8 Jun 2011 08:24:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wyb32 with SMTP id 32so656727wyb.16
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 08:45:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references
	:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=JQECwvaL8Xx8s9kPYaBphMLGb+w/9MMlvG2hTGzXVzY=;
	b=Zy3lE+7TKNXML70QyuNMd6T6ggIlZz8Ll9T5SqhP2Rxni9I0pG0itt3GxMCt2uNRQv
	CHsz5CLgyYAGbGmxwfe79Xn0wyNB3Vvv42Z9hQB/HyWABjsV6L4v7BHbgGi0FatN04y0
	GE0vIJGKAWlPyr+M8lp3FAnmFIAIAi3muLCTI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date
	:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding;
	b=tat8ifZ0sUkLMyyq1W6e19Tesr1EKiYJbLo0Mlpc0phkqFIX6ESolTu+zI9ezX6t06
	OZNg9ZIY3QGsdpidfK/jHpc8GIMRD1lStOcRiViCxINMFHpiDmElXQKjLihSGEE+H+7O
	qGdCYqPXlq4499K5AL75zkoMQSWsPfvo6wp60=
Received: by 10.227.152.132 with SMTP id g4mr7598627wbw.24.1307547910827;
	Wed, 08 Jun 2011 08:45:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.150.51.210] (gw0.net.jmsp.net [212.23.165.14])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id en1sm511505wbb.18.2011.06.08.08.45.09
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 08 Jun 2011 08:45:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: jdb@comx.dk
In-Reply-To: <1307546871.20906.223.camel@probook>
References: <BANLkTimU=0U_L-jKvcszQzJ7tgyif5j+BA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1307537773.3057.17.camel@edumazet-laptop>
	<BANLkTimJSzGJ4z5iseKt0KUsx8CKXJi16g@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=3yi4Wtu4+qsmf=YbPL4fZKf_gQQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1307545032.3057.45.camel@edumazet-laptop>
	<1307546871.20906.223.camel@probook>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:45:08 +0200
Message-ID: <1307547908.3057.53.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>, bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Notes about hacking on AQMs
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:24:41 -0000

Le mercredi 08 juin 2011 à 11:27 -0400, Jesper Dangaard Brouer a écrit :

> While this is a good coding approach, the end result is that nobody is
> using this stuff, because "tc" is so difficult to use, and its error
> feedback is so lousy that you will never figure out your small syntax
> errors.
> 

Well, I agree its really hard to even use 10% of tc features, but isnt
human brain has the same problem ? ;)

Most people playing with AQM setups are using scripts, or even script
generators for complex/dynamic cases.