From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ey0-f171.google.com (mail-ey0-f171.google.com
	[209.85.215.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4889421F0CE
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 01:55:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by eaaa12 with SMTP id a12so755675eaa.16
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 01:55:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date
	:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=OpHnlZ2gkzTBbwKkztHlVaQ6bDyTmORSL+8oHl59iR0=;
	b=qDvpxdmBcgjFA9Y+1zATk2iVrHHvuXYnYylVauawBg6pRkGbEHHSY/dvzIP85ULFvC
	VIU0cV8lyoelLmZOUspixy8qJcOQmIUOy19lZUm5cQO0wZkdP9+kETIQ1kJHcPhy4xIz
	aPAki3PIPm6OBUbUArQ2znp8zU3YLi2N9cgZPP1Q62+eyJKotNE+ySFhtXerTkyl9wT/
	uibHBC8pzMdK4r3wYidpQetAst++Q1YFPNOVhejVMT9VQERt/ZNPSiH5CGnSnZhczcmh
	ztl/8npU1luWjJShOcPpHanXRXPYbAycMCuX5EXslrcoRCVdqMduXN1BwOfQYObv5clJ
	8r8g==
Received: by 10.14.127.198 with SMTP id d46mr258962eei.101.1339664101809;
	Thu, 14 Jun 2012 01:55:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.162.245] ([74.125.121.33])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p41sm16707659eef.5.2012.06.14.01.54.59
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 14 Jun 2012 01:55:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <4FD9914A.2000509@ifi.uio.no>
References: <CAA93jw6n+rZeNxUzjmZ3QMnkgRKhjct+TTARv9nt3cvAbrjsEg@mail.gmail.com>
	<4FD9914A.2000509@ifi.uio.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:54:58 +0200
Message-ID: <1339664098.22704.684.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bloat] mosh, ecn, and diffserv marking
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 08:55:04 -0000

On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 09:22 +0200, Michael Welzl wrote:

> One ECN-specific concern that was addressed is that it's often in the 
> interest of the receiver, but not the sender, to lie about ECN and 
> simply cheat (reflect "nonono, no congestion at all" back to the 
> sender). This is addressed by RFC3540, which is experimental and not 
> really used.

Yes, apparently :(