From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CF7221F115 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 06:08:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from sandelman.ca (desk.marajade.sandelman.ca [209.87.252.247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D11CE2016D; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 09:12:36 -0500 (EST) Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 0773363761; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 09:07:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0A81636C7; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 09:07:30 -0500 (EST) From: Michael Richardson To: Keith Winstein In-Reply-To: References: <81564C0D7D4D2A4B9A86C8C7404A13DA0801AF@ESESSMB205.ericsson.se> X-Mailer: MH-E 8.3; nmh 1.3-dev; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 22) X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca Cc: "bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net" , "end2end-interest@postel.org" Subject: Re: [Bloat] [e2e] bufferbloat paper X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 14:08:19 -0000 Keith, thank you for this work. I don't know enough about how LTE towers buffer things, so my question. Have you considered repeating your test with two phones? Can the download on phone1 affect the latency seen by a second phone? Obviously the phones should be located right next to each other, with some verification that they are actually associated to the same tower. -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [ ] mcr@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [