From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dan@coverfire.com>
Received: from alpha.coverfire.com
	(dsiemon-2-pt.tunnel.tserv21.tor1.ipv6.he.net
	[IPv6:2001:470:1c:44e::2])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DAF021F0BA
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue,  1 Jan 2013 12:50:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.88.98] (titan.home [69.41.199.68])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by alpha.coverfire.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r01KoX2X029236
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 15:50:34 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=coverfire.com;
	s=alpha2011102501; t=1357073434;
	bh=Dbw0dmz+ZdB1kAuAa+qFPXkcsyT9EJIh0TC/xWMQhEU=;
	h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References;
	b=lyim7/MGU53E3TqiT4SqYOruGffBMHFuf4Wll6VUmFgvc7/xwjaP0pX2W20kUx2jl
	IlHASoIraIimJ8lPrL08nRiH2qWEFVJ4HL30m3L0i7aczD0FiTobdQ7Tf67PuwaI5V
	HKA2Cxf842R/Bf6vxH2TJZVjVlefroUGsoWCN9P8=
Message-ID: <1357073433.30524.5.camel@ganymede.home>
From: Dan Siemon <dan@coverfire.com>
To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 15:50:33 -0500
In-Reply-To: <1354237754.2200.33.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <CAA93jw5yFvrOyXu2s2DY3oK_0v3OaNfnL+1zTteJodfxtAAzcQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAA93jw5DcnWbE9Zb-JCeimT+YckUcM7AA3iiwXJx95Np2F8vmw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20121123221842.GD2829@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<CAGhGL2BoyZ+p+sD5kCq3n-8eQUkMa3gRj77m1x8ga262uY513g@mail.gmail.com>
	<1354237754.2200.33.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4 (3.4.4-2.fc17) 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.73 on 69.41.199.58
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_40,
	DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on alpha.coverfire.com
Subject: Re: [Bloat] [Cerowrt-devel] FQ_Codel lwn draft article review
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 20:50:36 -0000

On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 20:09 -0500, Dan Siemon wrote:
> People interested in per-host 'fairness' (with fq_codel per host) may
> want to experiment with a tc script I've been working on:
> 
> http://git.coverfire.com/?p=linux-qos-scripts.git;a=blob;f=src-3tos.sh;hb=HEAD
> 
> There are comments in the script which explain the approach.  I've
> collected some results but haven't gotten around to writing them up yet.

I finally got around to writing this up...

http://www.coverfire.com/archives/2013/01/01/improving-my-home-internet-performance/