From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from alpha.coverfire.com (dsiemon-2-pt.tunnel.tserv21.tor1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1c:44e::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37A5521F0F0 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:24:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.88.98] (ganymede.home [69.41.199.68]) (authenticated bits=0) by alpha.coverfire.com (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r0Q2OBim025630 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 21:24:11 -0500 Message-ID: <1359167051.15208.14.camel@ganymede.home> From: Dan Siemon To: bloat Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 21:24:11 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4 (3.4.4-2.fc17) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.73 on 69.41.199.58 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, DKIM_ADSP_DISCARD, T_DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on alpha.coverfire.com Subject: [Bloat] Bufferbloat / queueing in Linux blog post review? X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 02:24:13 -0000 Anyone interested in reviewing a blog post/article on queueing in the Linux network stack and Bufferbloat before I publish it? I want to make sure I get all the details right and would appreciate a sanity check. If you are, please contact me off list. Thanks.