From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-pa0-f53.google.com (mail-pa0-f53.google.com
	[209.85.220.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AA00200203
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:48:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id bg4so2610818pad.12
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:48:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=x-received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to
	:references:content-type:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding
	:mime-version; bh=9JLWP077I2gFAOzKMyNi6Ucpke7b9dFPO6M+PD5AF9M=;
	b=IVfUo1sSc0Su1i3LtwbYg8EnEQGLk03VgDAWjc3CASqtogkdF4luMvEJkWDXFuH/Z2
	yJpnavArps8GvFRjnxLlg0Be3ZuUhIRPPotalBJCgaAVCkil3DBGlf13d5ARn8mRdACn
	bh681I5oQqsRA1ucFV0K5f60iwTBH27n/hoWCCvcyUD2Sd27sk+zry865XIRfZCLnXyS
	SzBmIyVFNydYx1jqy4Vnt0+ZVlhLyTvF8Sp59PWPEYIgkOd5RyI8dqo6D6aYe9Eoyvco
	DU5H1UWkiiJC+0E3Spa/wKyPC7cpyRIW/sJdJ64yUgCunbyaaR0cVSmWUU+xDMJ+29eN
	iSVw==
X-Received: by 10.68.41.197 with SMTP id h5mr25102507pbl.88.1361904522707;
	Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:48:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.19.252.153] ([172.19.252.153])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f9sm2310467paz.12.2013.02.26.10.48.34
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:48:41 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <1361904513.11403.9.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:48:33 -0800
In-Reply-To: <CAJq5cE2wc4hg7i8QAWwaxoi_BUs386SpNTYgQqvB24dbi8+S6A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAH44Dxbt+fixeLHwmA7QnndhhUbAjUEORxAsfb5LarUD7a3ZMw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH44DxbBjqv77V-QDGeg+p-1pbZtBQa-BFt0wLTgSNXKXZ1vbg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJq5cE2wc4hg7i8QAWwaxoi_BUs386SpNTYgQqvB24dbi8+S6A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Testing fq_codel on Android Galaxy Nexus AK kernel
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:48:43 -0000

On Tue, 2013-02-26 at 20:27 +0200, Jonathan Morton wrote:
> Since the phone only has control of the bottleneck in the upload
> direction, a browse + upload or ping + upload or VoIP + upload test
> would be appropriate. It's important to control the link speed as much
> as possible to be the same for equivalent tests, and to try several
> different network conditions. 
> 
> Tests involving heavy downlink traffic would measure bloat at the cell
> tower, or at the ISP or access point for wifi tests. 

I have serious doubts this will show something.

I guess the queue of not yet sent packets will be _after_ qdisc layer,
in the network device itself.