From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-pb0-f51.google.com (mail-pb0-f51.google.com
	[209.85.160.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D11EA21F118
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 12:32:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pb0-f51.google.com with SMTP id un15so5850845pbc.10
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 12:32:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=x-received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to
	:references:content-type:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding
	:mime-version; bh=aPaFOEK+dAqSVElY+LNoMpyEEt5Ha4/Wvua7UbK0I64=;
	b=psNh+sqzD+R2J9Uxvictan69/IqWRpdgP7YGs4peNWkYHcN1gQyuIoVpnE202OSqW6
	AWlIcoxlnqA+b4tI4LHRb2LoDOX36y3i+5luThkYq5d4y67RNumQOl622ys4SXRw8VIl
	VFCisOsNNt239yci2G6NFWnNE8aVUOWi3hJ7ud4lpzsTuU2kzT152ojoAbwW3HiJtvc5
	2uWHJptHCeRhnqSD/Ep/v1otWPlyGsWrf3kn0Qu1hBRAa1iPeh+of8Fqm2RI+S6qvFPx
	RzNsGivqOlrQ6hQpsJr4IzhyLmbcfjwyQ7xuktO+p9ixqdaW0sh6HdOZZv2ZoD50DOK4
	gtIw==
X-Received: by 10.68.75.72 with SMTP id a8mr28970476pbw.143.1363548763334;
	Sun, 17 Mar 2013 12:32:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.19.242.99] ([172.19.242.99])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id kl4sm17490158pbc.31.2013.03.17.12.32.41
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Sun, 17 Mar 2013 12:32:42 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1363548760.29475.87.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 12:32:40 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20130317122449.3dce3692@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
References: <CAGhGL2BdnhRB0kz_AXb9X9=ph3016ODKDc_9kNm5wgO215NCTg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130317122449.3dce3692@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, tsv-area@ietf.org,
	bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>, aqm@ietf.org,
	Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Flow queuing performance (was: Re: [tsvwg] New Version
 Notification for draft-baker-tsvwg-aqm-recommendation-00.txt)
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 19:32:44 -0000

On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 12:24 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 15:12:16 -0400
> Jim Gettys <jg@freedesktop.org> wrote:
> 
> > As a result, at the last Linux Plumber's Conference in August, there was
> > general consensus that we could replace PFIFO_FAST as the default qdisc in
> > Linux, awaiting just our confidence that fq_codel (or something very
> > similar) was mature enough for such a step.
> 
> The only thing holding this back is that some user's still want to have priority queueing
> of control packets. I (and others) have done some experiments on layering a traditional
> three class priority layer on top of fq_codel, but nothing concrete has been submitted
> for review.


I did a patch on top of fq_codel to add 3 bands (same prio
classification than pfifo_fast).

I added a new attribute at that time to enable this 3 bands (and
disabling the external classifier, as it uses same skb->priority field.)

I probably better clone fq_codel, because if we want a pfifo_fast
replacement, it should run without the help of a "tc" command.