General list for discussing Bufferbloat
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: iccrg@irtf.org, tsvwg@ietf.org,
	bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	aqm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Fixes to Linux's network stack in kernels 3.9 and 3.10
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:49:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1366818544.8964.73.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5vSaKnWoLZ_1bW+kdXORimFOXLew2y=wn5tmqg_1Zisg@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 2013-04-24 at 02:19 -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
> There are a really large string of network related fixes going into
> the next two Linux kernels (3.9 and 3.10), in light of extensive tcp
> and bufferbloat related analyses at google.
> 
> Two of the most important (at least to my eye) are:
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=136241595507566&w=2
> 
> and
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=136392337900604&w=2

This one is definitely a must have for people using TSO or GSO

We are experimenting other fixes on this area.

> 
> Three more caught my eye as I was poking through the commit histories:
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=136382407631873&w=2
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=136639199530624&w=2
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=136580231922814&w=2
> 
> And that's just the tip of the iceberg!
> 
> I expect to have to rerun a ton of benchmarks as a result of these
> changes, and to have to throw out a lot of older data.  Please plan on
> having to do the same after these kernels are released....
> 
> 



      reply	other threads:[~2013-04-24 15:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-24  9:19 Dave Taht
2013-04-24 15:49 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1366818544.8964.73.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=aqm@ietf.org \
    --cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=iccrg@irtf.org \
    --cc=tsvwg@ietf.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox