From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-pa0-x234.google.com (mail-pa0-x234.google.com
	[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::234])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CC0521F1AD
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue,  4 Jun 2013 08:18:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id bg2so391867pad.39
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 08:18:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references
	:content-type:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version;
	bh=bTOvDZQy7VX5EYigmrMjM/+qX2MPy24S6tx46FG3h2M=;
	b=RSnQNkkkHtbB7lZ6W+tmokR3lvR/ICQFYFX5ptghcgSM7vEul5b8eBHSgBeTyRi9Tw
	KZofcYM/gqlWpqM5z9IwN7EEjAEew8laSSofWlr8uKAe2YYaRkn6DkEkogUP7OBuZAW1
	9R6UQmfZ6HGEuEP07RQLfTtjggrVxnArlS3G4cR57VuHKEiwaP4hBG31W0izeftzLAj3
	a414B4+Y/o7A2zlzj1p+Td/d97YGlZXuw/IdLSZRnnbVA0YLOXXdcAthfBBEuHW4imNd
	S8Dsvev9yH1lRlrRDNlC4lI7+2Csj8n9fSW7iqOMwJaQhnV/eYYQj0x88EFetpeni0WL
	cR5g==
X-Received: by 10.67.4.129 with SMTP id ce1mr29341579pad.107.1370359136804;
	Tue, 04 Jun 2013 08:18:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.26.49.73] ([172.26.49.73]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
	i16sm19248692pag.18.2013.06.04.08.18.54 for <multiple recipients>
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Tue, 04 Jun 2013 08:18:56 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1370359133.24311.208.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 08:18:53 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20130604141342.00c8eb9f@redhat.com>
References: <20130529151330.22c5c89e@redhat.com>
	<20130604141342.00c8eb9f@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: Toke =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>,
	Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>,
	Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Jiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com>, Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
	Steven Barth <cyrus@openwrt.org>, bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net,
	David Miller <davem@redhat.com>,
	Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@mbnet.fi>,
	Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>, Michal Soltys <soltys@ziu.info>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Bad shaping at low rates,
 after commit 56b765b79 (htb: improved accuracy at high rates)
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 15:18:57 -0000

On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 14:13 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> Hi again,
> 
> I found another regression by commit 56b765b79 (htb: improved accuracy
> at high rates).
> 
> After the commit HTB does not honor network rate limiting below 500kbps.
> 
> I have found that the bandwidth problem is related to GSO being enabled
> on the device.  To test the situation, I had to use a real NIC (as I
> were not allowed to disable GSO on dev "lo", test below).

Well, do not forget lo mtu is 64K, so you'll also have to lower it for
your tests.

I have a good idea of what's going on for htb at low rates, I am testing
a fix, thanks for the report !