From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ob0-x231.google.com (mail-ob0-x231.google.com
	[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::231])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 913B221F1AD
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue,  4 Jun 2013 13:50:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f177.google.com with SMTP id ta17so1284785obb.36
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 13:50:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references
	:content-type:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version;
	bh=M7pbRB944r37ESddT5p0I8ojuLtRCNLIEDzen2IkdVY=;
	b=qiQCTG4ZMxkk1gHsfF+p6dKHd9/C4Wh+fearyNe2XLCN5FM8aElIYwTvtAtiHT42bc
	ynA1ib9wexNIzLrD9TNP3v1vVXZ7QvYymQFKIXGMjXqfXiAdQwpvKueuqRiJGzcN1auH
	g718JTtXHPm7I5W/96rAaNaHRrt2Oo2rIHN72WLwUwNKuo40IfFT45aMRAXg1Y33cQEY
	x0Iw/6Ee6Evdr7TqYZHUfSGFZ6+ktuHuM9l9V66q00ZaeZlvCTOM31S0bBcSNbkmFZkD
	X2jRTYxVGdhr16St4uJw/SLY0GrUVKjo4M53gtJFFo9DRylCl2SVtRCuzKZFkJFGU3HO
	yBPA==
X-Received: by 10.60.174.111 with SMTP id br15mr4666864oec.130.1370379034804; 
	Tue, 04 Jun 2013 13:50:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2620:0:1000:3304:24dc:da34:eed0:64b6?
	([2620:0:1000:3304:24dc:da34:eed0:64b6])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id jt1sm51489635oeb.5.2013.06.04.13.50.32
	for <multiple recipients>
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Tue, 04 Jun 2013 13:50:33 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1370379031.24311.226.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 13:50:31 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20130604222135.67eedab8@redhat.com>
References: <20130529151330.22c5c89e@redhat.com>
	<20130604141342.00c8eb9f@redhat.com>
	<1370359133.24311.208.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<1370361306.24311.214.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<1370361727.24311.215.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<1370365908.24311.222.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<20130604222135.67eedab8@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: Toke =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>,
	Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>,
	Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net, Jiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>, Steven Barth <cyrus@openwrt.org>,
	David Miller <davem@redhat.com>,
	Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@mbnet.fi>,
	Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>, Michal Soltys <soltys@ziu.info>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] [PATCH] net_sched: htb: do not mix 1ns and 64ns time
	units
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 20:50:35 -0000

On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 22:21 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:

> But how is this 64-bit usage going to affect performance for smaller
> ARM/MIPS based home routers, where shaping at these low rates is more
> relevant?  (I'm just asking because I don't know, and just test this
> on a 24-CPU machine).

Well, by definition shaping at low rates is mostly using the timer
infra, and its already 64bit. You'll hardly spend time in HTB.

Note that psched_time_t is already 64bit wide.

Only psched_tdiff_t is 'unsigned long', and the change I made in this
patch will not change performance even on 32bit hosts.