From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-pa0-x229.google.com (mail-pa0-x229.google.com
	[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::229])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CDC221F113
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 09:58:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id bj1so99859pad.14
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 09:58:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version;
	bh=ufl+wFND1DbESHb9kAK72LDxgx0G1EZb7301ejP5aag=;
	b=FgNkAsvs5xHGXfQXO898NsjY0a5ThTRR0Ng8fIGctli95Vmxj7BYrDYq9P35qQe/fz
	jYbLCpd0hS+dTFpGu1kf+PFY9njo+ZMeA1cSwQ1HDA2r9EvnZsh84gLEOzwK4i4smBI+
	etfKcKY2I3LxtkcLVr1R7DF/pR1lfbsZoK53pqcX3w+IJRWkk+WRKpm999PcKjFKbark
	AW6OJiddxh4K7mNjYP18khWxMRSRUoKESdfO73XHx/T/wrevSar+yJDt7NJnQZ/uQlqn
	MicpsduHLXT8BsUEECmmH7UXuTuoOweLqA3D100G7AIIo+3vZ5oCgHy22Xake601gwY+
	/+EQ==
X-Received: by 10.66.121.131 with SMTP id lk3mr210139pab.61.1380128315331;
	Wed, 25 Sep 2013 09:58:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.19.254.196] ([172.19.254.196])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id j9sm54677909paj.18.1969.12.31.16.00.00
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Wed, 25 Sep 2013 09:58:34 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1380128313.3165.157.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: MUSCARIELLO Luca IMT/OLN <luca.muscariello@orange.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 09:58:33 -0700
In-Reply-To: <5243036F.90302@orange.com>
References: <CAA93jw6JVMWqjwAU+uKWjjT4rW1jTZPBLF71PztVR-GEMvvrOw@mail.gmail.com>
	<2719938E-E24A-4A06-898F-CE90CBED005C@inria.fr>
	<1380122152.3165.156.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<5243036F.90302@orange.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>, bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] [aqm] TSO sizing fixes and the new paced "fq" scheduler
 in Linux 3.12
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 16:58:36 -0000

On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 17:38 +0200, Luca MUSCARIELLO wrote:

> Then, I feel like FQ is a bad name to call this "newFQ".
> It's an implementation of a fair TCP pacer. Which is very useful, but FQ 
> is kind of misleading, IMHO.

No problem, feel free to send a patch. I am very bad at choosing names.