General list for discussing Bufferbloat
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Y <intruder_tkyf@yahoo.fr>
To: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: [Bloat] Stab overhead caliculation and mpu for ingress shaping.
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 03:37:38 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1488393458.14392.3.camel@yahoo.fr> (raw)

Hi , all.

I set root qdisc for traffic shaping like this

egress
$tc qdisc add dev $ext_ingress root handle 1: stab overhead -4
linklayer atm mpu 60 mtu 2048 tsize 256 hfsc default 13

ingress
$tc qdisc add dev $ext root handle 1: stab overhead -4 mpu 53 linklayer
atm mtu 2048 tsize 256 hfsc default 26
($ works at script )

PPPoA WAN - modem/router - Ethernet LAN - My pc 1 interface.

engress overhead of PPPoA via ethernet is -4 and mpu 53.
This is certain.
We can think without Ethernet padding at stab.

My asking is whether that This is also correct at ingress shaping or
not?

mpu for ingress in myscript = 60.
Because of minimal ethernet packet size = 60( with padding without FCS)

oevrhead for ingress in myscript = -4.
Because I want to shape connection , so , must set speed setting * 48 /
53.

This is certain or not?

Yuta. 

For example. 
see this section (Extensive framing compensation (for DSL/ATM/PPPoe))
https://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/codel/wiki/Cake/

             reply	other threads:[~2017-03-01 18:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-01 18:37 Y [this message]
2017-03-01 21:36 ` Sebastian Moeller
2017-03-02  2:23   ` Y
2017-03-02  2:28   ` Y
2017-03-02  7:55   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-03-02  8:14     ` Sebastian Moeller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1488393458.14392.3.camel@yahoo.fr \
    --to=intruder_tkyf@yahoo.fr \
    --cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox