From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Aaron Wood <woody77@gmail.com>
Cc: bloat <Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] sch_fq pacing rate: Xbps, but at which layer in the network stack?
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 11:00:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1492192844.10587.78.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALQXh-MyNW-DnQZNVp9q-=5o1eye0u8T38vwEB-+3Q4jEEdvUQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 20:12 -0700, Aaron Wood wrote:
> When I was testing with my iPerf changes, I realized that the sch_fq
> pacing (which in iperf is set via setsockopt()), is pacing at a
> bandwidth that's set at a pretty low level in the stack (which makes
> sense). This is different from the application pacing that iperf does
> (which is pacing the goodput).
>
>
> But it's not clear to me where the X bps determination is being made.
> My current guess is that it's at the interface level (since that's
> where sch_fq is), and so it's approximately "bytes on the wire", minus
> preambles and inter-packet spacing, and whatnot. And so it's
> including all the 802.x headers involved (vlan tags, qos tags,
> source/dest macs, etc). Is this correct?
>
Like other qdisc having rate limits (TBF, HTB ....), FQ sees packets
with all headers (including Ethernet one)
This is why the default quantum is 3028, which is exactly 2 regular
Ethernet frames (MTU=1500 + 14 bytes of Ethernet header)
If you have VLAN tag, it is generally not included in the calculation,
as many devices provide 'hardware tagging'.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-14 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-14 3:12 Aaron Wood
2017-04-14 18:00 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2017-04-14 23:38 ` Aaron Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1492192844.10587.78.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=woody77@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox