From: Simon Barber <simon@superduper.net>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>, Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
Cc: Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>,
bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] SO_SNDBUF and SO_RCVBUF
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 15:20:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14ce337d3c8.27f7.e972a4f4d859b00521b2b659602cb2f9@superduper.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1429739215.18561.151.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Wouldn't the LOWAT setting be much easier for applications to use if it was
set in estimated time (ie time it will take to deliver the data) rather
than bytes?
Simon
Sent with AquaMail for Android
http://www.aqua-mail.com
On April 22, 2015 2:47:34 PM Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-04-22 at 14:05 -0700, Rick Jones wrote:
> > On 04/22/2015 02:02 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > Yeah, the real nice thing is TCP_NOTSENT_LOWAT added in linux-3.12
> >
> > Don't go telling Dave about that, he wants me to put too much into
> > netperf as it is!-)
>
> Note that one can also set a sysctl, in case netperf author does not
> want to change its baby ;)
>
> echo 131072 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_notsent_lowat
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-22 22:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-22 19:10 Hal Murray
2015-04-22 19:26 ` Rick Jones
2015-04-22 19:28 ` Dave Taht
2015-04-22 21:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-22 21:05 ` Rick Jones
2015-04-22 21:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-22 22:20 ` Simon Barber [this message]
2015-04-22 23:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-24 4:37 ` Dave Taht
2015-04-24 4:40 ` Dave Taht
2015-04-24 13:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-24 14:34 ` Dave Taht
2015-04-24 16:31 ` Rick Jones
2015-04-24 18:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-24 5:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-22 21:07 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2015-04-22 21:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-22 21:47 ` Dave Taht
2015-04-22 22:11 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14ce337d3c8.27f7.e972a4f4d859b00521b2b659602cb2f9@superduper.net \
--to=simon@superduper.net \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=hmurray@megapathdsl.net \
--cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox