From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D5973CB38 for ; Fri, 5 Jul 2024 08:30:10 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmx.de; s=s31663417; t=1720182608; x=1720787408; i=moeller0@gmx.de; bh=1G87mk57O6jNJ955iD4DE5RosxmlDT+8WC6OLCbKO94=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From: In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id: References:To:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from: message-id:mime-version:reply-to:subject:to; b=dNubOgAUoO4bZFV/XFwn0ni5HGk2ZT953IHsTh8XgEUgIGdFRdrbTTBD477aswym zqFs3fTgWmvJ6hiLWXDBxewTW5lZGJSSfIZY+vIY9GpXJ3nBu3jRwPZayc8PZ9Ah7 M9lEBI7XHCl9CiCzdf701tcQ0zfnnDOCojUKbO2kB/klWyla7ln0m50l1GvBsH0Cr UFMbpTuoMTDJII80bbDwN66I5bXGpZ9UjvFdoZNOO8e2MdYNBWMOX8fGFFKKgiEJm dZSlNpg/+UUPQsMVWeBHpRx7bilXEQiKBo58PivmCfyIN0u6bGfT9Usa/t2R53fHk 5Oc0DhwRcFmQYHIcmg== X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a Received: from smtpclient.apple ([134.76.241.253]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N4z6k-1sFZ9o2ENg-010D7L; Fri, 05 Jul 2024 14:30:08 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.600.62\)) From: Sebastian Moeller In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 14:29:58 +0200 Cc: bloat Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <1770FA0A-4530-47F0-B0DF-E07964F97AC2@gmx.de> References: To: =?utf-8?Q?Dave_T=C3=A4ht?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.600.62) X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:bKAf6Fzo9jarE2FB5oeYe3elO02VP4n1HLP0s/ligkE1jvvwc8Z yc/XQlaEvFjfdU8Lez2sqN/qaKvZ+jv8vpZTFsKnc8zcJtRYwD6/hrJKlH+bY/KDzKI7plk xWn+AjyZZZTpd2eM2fYfcgka0wyxZ4Bn+4jl236IgEgC0l2eGLLwrOgidntZhxhOMhv7o7P lNYBpD2GyPmFeXugZdRxQ== X-Spam-Flag: NO UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:/Jg3rhftcZg=;uN2+XfOB7MCl/+BHsywBJTYpah/ m+nI8cigyVS2M9yT899jp01GVxoxFBH3ud9JVIr6iuKw8zytP1GJv3Vb845D7L0+xXRFLrzUB 2ZIA2w6trq2FY1llLk30taQuA4Fh9R/AgqIL7kDK5wcnB5XHYjJGAVEbZhMhZOcEcqImRFHvd g8GSJaL8RYdKm3TmgUq692sT6A2RmBZiXbp8jwWUL3ZnKKIHeHJprCBomNFPCxNuhApjwZ5m1 WqYznZexR9IttmlskDlNgaEAhYaMgcUmB0Os2uZ5q9YpM1LU1vkivFsPPfBWSuQZB/IGPpBTJ sYotoy8Gxw/xucxj8VwjlZjSf3ZQ3lObANjZVn/vZg6RgitWGeB9WuRI6A1dnlUKISmE+YFXe fdpa5Hx5jElk4yr6VuWtTLMxCBCX5fizm6h8m7TGtrwVgR/fK6I25AQ2/ip7EzxlKZEwFAagq jSZ2uDteSFf3JsC1+LKBLB4LPX2+AvemVFEl/LwHa2FnLxqwk5opVcT+/ah7O8750T7N0mpqm 52LlHZWvkyP1yLSyR6hkIRBvU1VKKkEzPfgdh1pFWc9+RlZNrMYwp8b6xoXkv3n2pfXJjn2y8 5Ha5dw6sna9IsVhg/maaJUW+D9OxiHuAvSxw9HlOkkVGY+OhFseGqPvmMg7NChyS28kztUdAi 4JYQWQ9BAFiiWtHzAFU5U+OSVb0JTVG1ZRp4wUUKri0/e2nhBGcW6zzu3apZRXqnRpagMAM2x Eg40N7fEvDhN/LNNGihm2BDmXiCjOtGO7RLXXo/mNHEVMfnQZtXVX6XtJltuWo4zL1rmdRcMw yjRusDx/4qxbR68C+2ZxBUfqfa2nG9SdvnaLB5NWtJ4h8= Subject: Re: [Bloat] snailload attack X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2024 12:30:10 -0000 Quick note. as expected putting a FQ-scheduler on the bottleneck significantly = reduces the 'signal' this method relies on: example images on https://postimg.cc/gallery/zG1Zpsr SQM with load: tempImageOcR00H und tempImagePOTb74 noSQM with load: tempImagecaukYG und tempImageLxFJ4J (the other two are SQM/noSQM with idle load) > On 5. Jul 2024, at 02:36, Dave Taht via Bloat = wrote: >=20 >=20 >=20 > = https://thehackernews.com/2024/06/new-snailload-attack-exploits-network.ht= ml >=20 >=20 > --=20 > = https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7203400057172180992/ > Donations Drive. > Dave T=C3=A4ht CSO, LibreQos > _______________________________________________ > Bloat mailing list > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat