From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <moeller0@gmx.de>
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "mout.gmx.net",
	Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA7AA21F508
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 11:10:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hms-beagle-7.home.lan ([217.247.196.91]) by mail.gmx.com
	(mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MSIf1-1ZYFe33x6Z-00TSK5 for
	<bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 20:10:13 +0200
From: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 20:10:09 +0200
References: <CAA93jw5o4v1NXy8UOxS47zn6_y6Q1f9uSX2WgcVD87aaEs_ScQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Message-Id: <17A671BF-59B9-41B2-B629-FFB211A134F4@gmx.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:GG8u+IVc/Q1syy8zFqhTh0bBVBunyKKhZB4aaBXXcp0YIiYlMQd
	VWWuJ5f/+Mai9BC5UXZxWwA+EDHHUnIl8iTX2VXzDy2f3mLVhA46t0awDwltGprta6A/Pi2
	1y1TViFuNDTtt+dBiOLrpUrRxoDL6+wUPXBpblAKdshsjtqmBXeTT9QIwjZmYIFgDJA6/yj
	R4btREwMnSPiyKiC55HTg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:MKf6c02o+TM=:502cgnX11MMCaMS0gSgSaC
	kMwmYr0ciSna5L9LgX2GOTIB3iwmMFB3K3540cCM+5HxuRfc4LAaNaipol9wgrL7deSj5n7dZ
	WyxiDcvBpdhZltInGbk1SJczuZePQIAzYh51sL/809q25jJjl5cpgH+Jktw7X5GqNAUZqmnGS
	W+UgemJpBo16jgfk/xx6m+uN+KHoioxWOfsA7Stok7UAddHlBDXPg+uDgMgMaBAgTNjy1X1y1
	Skw0ABhziZNY6R7AkwsS/BVKg1WAub4YjyQKt+sj2p4nTq/fukzGNI5xAKWbzh6naFkezuC1a
	InUnSGHHEgg0D6+wNsBcM2TUYGdT5EGoRjskavkx7dX1szA7HFoYrCyQKkner3YlJzT5PK6H7
	KIDBfTyAS23D93uuMYmnPuHGPUM6Wgq+Qp2IAP1zsvHLT+foIPi1DuuTFSYgCUHKCfocTvbmP
	rxoCYpvRxr/JN5rDc3+Ox9WplnTHcmWyAp3T4pW3kqc1MgMjUkwKxT+XrsZNxYOeOLiQnGYT0
	73AGbpph9wLVK99cbfnLMUzLAw4z2mEoh5OctsmU7Y+UfIXEZriKyrOyx+FkOggTztQILXYfr
	uo3rsBkQ+3Pcn2FWQibbcvrVR6n1/p7hFncYX/hCtckhDn0uy5TYnAZkNK07OxF8i8y0E9uLS
	XGs4og4cSUtUYkz1lfAWsHHfOXBQUDYKNduXhuRPY0auB2EJC8C4esVvu4+yOK+mqmgY=
Subject: [Bloat] Fwd:  sweeping up the bloat
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 18:10:44 -0000

Dear list,

it seems my reply-all skill got a bit rusty, so here I go again ;) =
(threading might be broken?)

On Jun 16, 2015, at 19:53 , Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:

> [...]
> Quic does pacing, so far as I know, entirely in userspace, or does it
> rely on sch_fq to do so? Should a VOIP app or server like freeswitch
> use it?
[=85]

I thought a voip app will pace simply by virtue of having to collect =
10-20ms seconds worth of audio before packing this up and send it off. I =
have not looked at packet captures but my H0 is that there should be one =
UDP packet every 20ms, which I would call natural or data-driven pacing. =
I would not be too amazed if in reality instead of 1 packet per 20ms the =
app would send N packets every N*20ms; sad, yes, but not amazed.


Best Regards
       Sebastian