From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Brooks <db48x@yahoo.com>
Cc: bloat-devel <bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Progress with latency-under-load tool
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 08:43:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1A0E96CF-CFF6-4475-9DDB-C6329493D33F@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3d3llgln8.fsf@yahoo.com>
On 21 Mar, 2011, at 6:09 am, Daniel Brooks wrote:
> Oof. I guess the loopback driver could use some work as well :)
Either that or there is some strange timing effect going on that I should be aware of. I'm going to try to run some more tests to see if I can get the smoothness and responsiveness values up, but if any of you notice something bizarre...
Be aware however that both smoothness and responsiveness are taken as the absolute worst cases observed. If there is a bell curve, you're going to be looking at outliers. Perhaps I should calculate something like a 7-number summary to sanity-check it.
- Jonathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-21 6:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-16 2:31 Jonathan Morton
2011-03-16 17:12 ` Rick Jones
2011-03-17 23:38 ` grenville armitage
2011-03-19 17:44 ` Jonathan Morton
2011-03-20 10:45 ` Jonathan Morton
2011-03-20 20:33 ` grenville armitage
2011-03-20 20:53 ` Dave Täht
2011-03-20 21:52 ` Jonathan Morton
2011-03-20 22:32 ` Dave Täht
2011-03-20 22:47 ` Dave Täht
2011-03-20 22:52 ` Jonathan Morton
2011-03-20 22:55 ` Dave Täht
2011-03-20 23:42 ` Dave Täht
2011-03-20 21:50 ` [Bloat] Some results of the latency under load tool Dave Täht
2011-03-20 22:24 ` Jonathan Morton
[not found] ` <m3d3llgln8.fsf@yahoo.com>
2011-03-21 6:43 ` Jonathan Morton [this message]
2011-03-22 1:13 ` [Bloat] Progress with latency-under-load tool Kim Hawtin
2011-03-22 7:10 ` Jonathan Morton
2011-03-23 10:33 ` Otto Solares Cabrera
2011-03-23 11:26 ` Jonathan Morton
2011-03-23 19:27 ` Otto Solares
2011-03-23 20:40 ` Jonathan Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1A0E96CF-CFF6-4475-9DDB-C6329493D33F@gmail.com \
--to=chromatix99@gmail.com \
--cc=bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=db48x@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox