From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-34-ewr.dyndns.com (mxout-129-ewr.mailhop.org [216.146.33.129]) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32CD22E04C4 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:15:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scan-31-ewr.mailhop.org (scan-31-ewr.local [10.0.141.237]) by mail-34-ewr.dyndns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1FBF70947E for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:15:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 () X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS X-Originating-IP: 70.61.120.58 Received: from smtp.tuxdriver.com (charlotte.tuxdriver.com [70.61.120.58]) by mail-34-ewr.dyndns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F940707ED5 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:15:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from uucp by smtp.tuxdriver.com with local-rmail (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Q50rQ-0002zF-JZ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:15:20 -0400 Received: from linville-8530p.local (linville-8530p.local [127.0.0.1]) by linville-8530p.local (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2UJBvC4032387; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:11:57 -0400 Received: (from linville@localhost) by linville-8530p.local (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p2UJBv6p032385; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:11:57 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:11:57 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net Message-ID: <20110330191156.GC2520@tuxdriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: "Nathaniel J. Smith" Subject: [Bloat] debloat-testing tree rebased, some patches dropped X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:15:29 -0000 FYI... I have rebased the wireless-testing tree on 2.6.39-rc1. As previously stated, I plan to track the -rc and final releases, rebasing on each -rc1. The rebase is a little ugly/painful, but it is a good way to avoid building-up too much cruft in a tree that isn't going to be pulled by Linus anyway. I dropped the patches that were already present in 2.6.39-rc1, along with the ones that had gotten reverted in debloat-testing already. I also dropped Nathaniel's iwlwifi patches, as the iwlwifi/iwlegacy split made preserving them a little awkward. Maybe Nathaniel can post revisions? Anyway, that doesn't leave much -- a couple of ugly patches from Dave and me, neither likely to make it upstream. They are looking a bit lonely in there...surely someone has some experimental stuff that craves an audience of testers? Let me know if there are problems! John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.