From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.tuxdriver.com (charlotte.tuxdriver.com [70.61.120.58]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A51A22008F3 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 06:01:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from uucp by smtp.tuxdriver.com with local-rmail (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Qnsq3-00032i-Ne; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 09:47:23 -0400 Received: from linville-8530p.local (linville-8530p.local [127.0.0.1]) by linville-8530p.local (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p71DUkZh028519; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 09:30:46 -0400 Received: (from linville@localhost) by linville-8530p.local (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p71DUj8i028518; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 09:30:45 -0400 Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 09:30:45 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: Dave Taht Message-ID: <20110801133044.GA28112@tuxdriver.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, bloat Subject: Re: [Bloat] bufferbloat bug 216 could use some eyeballs badly X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 13:01:42 -0000 On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 06:06:43AM -0600, Dave Taht wrote: > If anyone can spare some eyeballs for the discussion of wireless-n AMPDUs > and their interaction with bufferbloat, and groks TCP's behavior and/or > wireless's behavior, I'd appreciate some comment on: > > http://www.bufferbloat.net/issues/216 > > Losing SOME appropriate packets, somewhere in the wireless stack, is > necessary. It seems appropriate to Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org for this... -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.