From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Received: from smtp.tuxdriver.com (charlotte.tuxdriver.com [70.61.120.58])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A51A22008F3
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Mon,  1 Aug 2011 06:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uucp by smtp.tuxdriver.com with local-rmail (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <linville@tuxdriver.com>)
	id 1Qnsq3-00032i-Ne; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 09:47:23 -0400
Received: from linville-8530p.local (linville-8530p.local [127.0.0.1])
	by linville-8530p.local (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p71DUkZh028519;
	Mon, 1 Aug 2011 09:30:46 -0400
Received: (from linville@localhost)
	by linville-8530p.local (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p71DUj8i028518;
	Mon, 1 Aug 2011 09:30:45 -0400
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 09:30:45 -0400
From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20110801133044.GA28112@tuxdriver.com>
References: <CAA93jw5jPe__jjxo5PMUm5S6ffcyapmqzXgXqtNX4Cd0ToE7vA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5jPe__jjxo5PMUm5S6ffcyapmqzXgXqtNX4Cd0ToE7vA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] bufferbloat bug 216 could use some eyeballs badly
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 13:01:42 -0000

On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 06:06:43AM -0600, Dave Taht wrote:
> If anyone can spare some eyeballs for the discussion of wireless-n AMPDUs
> and their interaction with bufferbloat, and groks TCP's behavior and/or
> wireless's behavior, I'd appreciate some comment on:
> 
> http://www.bufferbloat.net/issues/216
> 
> Losing SOME appropriate packets, somewhere in the wireless stack, is
> necessary.

It seems appropriate to Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org for this...

-- 
John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com			might be all we have.  Be ready.