From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sesse@samfundet.no>
Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no (cassarossa.samfundet.no
	[129.241.93.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5E73200B33
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sat,  7 Apr 2012 14:32:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pannekake.samfundet.no ([2001:700:300:1800::dddd] ident=unknown)
	by cassarossa.samfundet.no with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <sesse@samfundet.no>)
	id 1SGdEL-0006e0-Kj; Sat, 07 Apr 2012 23:31:34 +0200
Received: from sesse by pannekake.samfundet.no with local (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <sesse@samfundet.no>)
	id 1SGdEL-0000NZ-9T; Sat, 07 Apr 2012 23:31:33 +0200
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2012 23:31:33 +0200
From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jdb@comx.dk>
Message-ID: <20120407213132.GE21430@uio.no>
References: <20120406222138.GB12641@uio.no>
	<1333811327.30705.4.camel@edumazet-laptop>
	<CAA93jw57DXSVOtz_Z6b85iSu0a9q67LGhgpHX+YPPxo2oGQWHg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120407153548.GC21452@uio.no>
	<D6DCDC0C-0754-4CE8-8C54-C2A809DB51A7@gmail.com>
	<20120407181034.GD21452@uio.no>
	<CAA93jw5hPBmonhuoww9MqB0z0-uncatP5jGMrrCAepH5ouUwrQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120407185456.GE21452@uio.no> <20120407190134.GF21452@uio.no>
	<9B4DB5BB110D1742A9FBC310C8011FD303E58D@comxexch02.comx.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9B4DB5BB110D1742A9FBC310C8011FD303E58D@comxexch02.comx.local>
X-Operating-System: Linux 3.3.0 on a x86_64
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Best practices for paced TCP on Linux?
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2012 21:32:41 -0000

On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 11:13:59PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> The stream from http://pannekake.samfundet.no:3013 is fairly stable,
> compared to e.g. http://cesur.tg12.gathering.org:9094/, but is clear
> that sometimes excessive buffering does occur.

Note that right now I think you're comparing 3Mbit/sec to 5Mbit/sec.

In any case, the main interesting part is over now; and seemingly Dave's wmem
trick was what pushed it to usable for our Norwegian viewers. So thanks a
bunch -- our viewers seem to be very happy. =)

/* Steinar */
-- 
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/