From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no (cassarossa.samfundet.no [IPv6:2001:700:300:1800::1919]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB642200B49 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 11:04:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pannekake.samfundet.no ([2001:700:300:1800::dddd] ident=unknown) by cassarossa.samfundet.no with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T2nO6-000642-AY for bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 20:04:42 +0200 Received: from sesse by pannekake.samfundet.no with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T2nO5-0004Qh-7B for bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 20:04:41 +0200 Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 20:04:41 +0200 From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net Message-ID: <20120818180440.GA28932@uio.no> References: <502E064C.50305@etorok.net> <502F6279.1090708@etorok.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: Linux 3.4.9-kvm on a x86_64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: [Bloat] [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt 3.3.8-17: nice latency improvements, some issues with bind X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 18:04:47 -0000 On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 10:07:45AM -0700, Dave Taht wrote: > Some work was done on debloating the iwl last year, I don't know if > any of the work made it into mainline. Based on personal experience with 3.6.0-rc1 and my iwl3945, I think iwlwifi is pretty bloated still. But this is unscientific; it's just “it feels that way”, no hard numbers. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/