From: Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Bufferbloat Paper
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 15:19:40 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130109201941.0271A5CC5BE@lawyers.icir.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5864.1357762442@sandelman.ca>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 997 bytes --]
> >>>>> "Mark" == Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org> writes:
> Mark> less than 1Gbps, but I forget the actual wireless technology
> Mark> used on
> Mark> the IHR). The IHRs are all run into a switch (SW) at 1Gbps. The
> Mark> switch connects to the Internet via a 1Gbps link (so, this is a
> Mark> theoretical bottleneck right here ...). The "REH" is the
> Mark> remote end
> Mark> host. We monitor via mirroring on SW.
>
> 1) do you max out your 1Gb/s uplink at all?
No. I do not believe we have seen peaks anywhere close to 1Gbps.
> 2) have you investigated bufferbloat on that port of the switch?
> (and do you have congestion issues on your mirror port?
> I guess that the point of the loss analysis...)
Correct - that is the point of the measurement loss analysis. We
believe we are losing very few packets during the measurement process.
Therefore, we believe the traces to be a faithful representation of what
has happened on-the-wire.
allman
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 194 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-09 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-07 23:37 Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2013-01-08 0:33 ` Dave Taht
2013-01-08 0:40 ` David Lang
2013-01-08 2:04 ` Mark Watson
2013-01-08 2:24 ` David Lang
2013-01-09 20:08 ` Michael Richardson
2013-01-08 4:52 ` Mark Watson
2013-01-08 1:54 ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-01-08 2:15 ` Oliver Hohlfeld
2013-01-08 12:44 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2013-01-08 13:55 ` Mark Allman
2013-01-09 0:03 ` David Lang
2013-01-10 13:01 ` Mark Allman
2013-01-09 20:14 ` Michael Richardson
2013-01-09 20:19 ` Mark Allman [this message]
2013-01-09 20:31 ` Michael Richardson
2013-01-10 18:05 ` Mark Allman
2013-01-08 14:04 ` Mark Allman
2013-01-08 17:22 ` Dave Taht
2013-01-09 20:05 ` Michael Richardson
2013-01-09 20:14 ` Mark Allman
2013-01-08 7:35 [Bloat] bufferbloat paper Ingemar Johansson S
2013-01-18 22:00 ` Haiqing Jiang
2013-01-08 19:03 Hal Murray
2013-01-08 20:28 ` Jonathan Morton
2013-01-09 0:12 ` David Lang
2013-01-09 1:59 ` Mark Allman
2013-01-09 4:53 ` David Lang
2013-01-09 5:13 ` Jonathan Morton
2013-01-09 5:32 ` Mark Allman
[not found] <87r4lvgss4.fsf@toke.dk>
2013-01-09 3:39 ` [Bloat] Bufferbloat Paper Mark Allman
2013-01-09 5:02 ` David Lang
2013-01-18 1:23 ` grenville armitage
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130109201941.0271A5CC5BE@lawyers.icir.org \
--to=mallman@icir.org \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=mcr@sandelman.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox