From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from rock.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (rock.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU [192.150.186.19]) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D443C21F0F2 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 12:19:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB2B52C4010; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 12:19:41 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU Received: from rock.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (maihub.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id VDwcFGy0oZpz; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 12:19:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from guns.icir.org (adsl-69-222-35-58.dsl.bcvloh.ameritech.net [69.222.35.58]) by rock.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57AAE2C400B; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 12:19:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from lawyers.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by guns.icir.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECDF7E25BCC; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 15:19:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from lawyers.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lawyers.icir.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0271A5CC5BE; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 15:19:40 -0500 (EST) To: Michael Richardson From: Mark Allman In-Reply-To: <5864.1357762442@sandelman.ca> Organization: International Computer Science Institute (ICSI) Song-of-the-Day: Nobody Told Me X-URL-0: http://www.icir.org/mallman-files/Document40120.docx X-URL-1: http://www.icir.org/mallman-files/Document38576.xls MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="--------ma53468-1"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 15:19:40 -0500 Sender: mallman@icir.org Message-Id: <20130109201941.0271A5CC5BE@lawyers.icir.org> Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Bloat] Bufferbloat Paper X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: mallman@icir.org List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 20:19:42 -0000 ----------ma53468-1 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline > >>>>> "Mark" == Mark Allman writes: > Mark> less than 1Gbps, but I forget the actual wireless technology > Mark> used on > Mark> the IHR). The IHRs are all run into a switch (SW) at 1Gbps. The > Mark> switch connects to the Internet via a 1Gbps link (so, this is a > Mark> theoretical bottleneck right here ...). The "REH" is the > Mark> remote end > Mark> host. We monitor via mirroring on SW. > > 1) do you max out your 1Gb/s uplink at all? No. I do not believe we have seen peaks anywhere close to 1Gbps. > 2) have you investigated bufferbloat on that port of the switch? > (and do you have congestion issues on your mirror port? > I guess that the point of the loss analysis...) Correct - that is the point of the measurement loss analysis. We believe we are losing very few packets during the measurement process. Therefore, we believe the traces to be a faithful representation of what has happened on-the-wire. allman ----------ma53468-1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAlDt0NwACgkQWyrrWs4yIs4uFQCZAfwuAqjnZYRL/TjgBL3KWUrx I5UAn3WqO0YZpdTpRGVBGeEMt6IewigA =Nnvz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----------ma53468-1--