From: Oliver Hohlfeld <oliver@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de>
To: tsvwg@ietf.org, bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bloat] [tsvwg] how much of a problem is buffer bloat today?
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 21:47:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130321204752.GA18256@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1303211254420.17535@nftneq.ynat.uz>
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 01:04:21PM -0700, David Lang wrote:
> Also, if you measure the impact of bufferbloat in terms of how many
> seconds a day the line is impacted, you get a horribly skewed view of
> the impact.
I agree that such a temporal view will skew the results. The approach
taken in Mark Allman's paper is to measure the magnitude by measuring
the number of affected packets relative to the total number of packets.
This implies the amount of time a user can potentially suffer from
buffer bloat when actively using the line. It's not relative to when
the user is idle.
Oliver
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-21 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <51408BF4.7090304@cisco.com>
[not found] ` <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B7D020F@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
2013-03-21 17:50 ` Oliver Hohlfeld
2013-03-21 18:01 ` Jim Gettys
2013-03-21 18:14 ` Oliver Hohlfeld
2013-03-21 18:28 ` Jim Gettys
2013-03-21 18:36 ` Dave Taht
2013-03-21 19:08 ` Oliver Hohlfeld
2013-03-21 19:25 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2013-03-21 20:05 ` Jim Gettys
2013-03-22 4:27 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2013-03-22 6:00 ` [Bloat] [aqm] " grenville armitage
2013-03-22 13:23 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2013-03-22 13:31 ` Dave Taht
2013-03-26 17:25 ` Mirja Kuehlewind
2013-03-26 17:49 ` [Bloat] [tsvwg] [aqm] " Scheffenegger, Richard
2013-03-26 20:02 ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2013-03-21 20:04 ` [Bloat] [tsvwg] " David Lang
2013-03-21 20:47 ` Oliver Hohlfeld [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130321204752.GA18256@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de \
--to=oliver@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=tsvwg@ietf.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox