General list for discussing Bufferbloat
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Vijay Subramanian <subramanian.vijay@gmail.com>
Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net,
	"Rong Pan \(ropan\)" <ropan@cisco.com>,
	"aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>,
	mysuryan@cisco.com,
	"Preethi Natarajan \(prenatar\)" <prenatar@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] [aqm] PIE code available
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 17:03:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130510170309.07f58589@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGK4HS8tz-qOfE69GeiE7t1sc12yhF6gdk4GJr9TN+ew1ei9BQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 10 May 2013 16:39:05 -0700
Vijay Subramanian <subramanian.vijay@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi folks,
> 
> We are finally in a position to release the PIE (Proportional Integral
> controller Enhanced) Linux code.
> Many of you are already aware of the work at IETF and discussions on PIE on
> the aqm and bloat mailing lists. Thanks for all the feedback.
> 
> Documents and code are available over ftp at ftp://ftpeng.cisco.com/pie
> The Linux code is available at ftp://ftpeng.cisco.com/pie/linux_code
> 
> PIE is written as a kernel module and should work with recent kernels.
> There is also a patch to
> iproute-3.9 tc tool to configure PIE. README files explain the usage. The
> complete source files are also available so it should not be too difficult
> to make it compile on a different iproute2 version.
> 
> Please check that your basic tests are in sync with what we have seen.
> Sample results are available at
> ftp://ftpeng.cisco.com/pie/linux_code/linux_sampleresults/
> Please let us know if you see any discrepancies.
> 
> Thanks in advance for all code reviews. If you have suggestions to improve
> the code, they are welcome. (Thanks to Eric Dumazet and Dave Taht for Codel
> codebase). We will also release a version of PIE called Fair-queue-PIE soon
> (hopefully by the end of the month).
> 
> If you have any questions, let us know.
> 
> Thanks,
> on behalf of PIE team,
> 
> Vijay Subramanian

Why not submit it to netdev and get real hard review?

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-11  0:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-10 23:39 [Bloat] " Vijay Subramanian
2013-05-11  0:03 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2013-05-11  0:44   ` [Bloat] [aqm] " Vijay Subramanian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130510170309.07f58589@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=aqm@ietf.org \
    --cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=mysuryan@cisco.com \
    --cc=prenatar@cisco.com \
    --cc=ropan@cisco.com \
    --cc=subramanian.vijay@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox