General list for discussing Bufferbloat
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Jaume Barcelo <jaume.barcelo@upf.edu>
Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bloat] sweet tcp
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 10:56:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130709105636.61f590cc@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJpd8ptg46TmHk=cFECAqspXctW_OwnBc8ORf7Sbo1cUoThScg@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 9 Jul 2013 19:38:40 +0200
Jaume Barcelo <jaume.barcelo@upf.edu> wrote:

> To be more specific, TCP would be at any time increasing or decreasing
> the congestion window. In other words, it will be moving in one
> direction (right or left) along the x axis of Fig. 1 of Getty's paper.
> Each RTT, the performance is measured in terms of delay and
> throughput. If there is a performance improvement, we keep moving in
> the same direction. If there is a performance loss, we change the
> direction.

TCP can not get a reliable measure of RTT. This is the whole reason
that delay based algorithms are not widely deployed and don't work
outside the lab. The issue is that other traffic perturbs RTT measurements
have a huge variance on a real network  (more noise than signal).

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-09 17:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-09 17:38 Jaume Barcelo
2013-07-09 17:56 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2013-07-09 19:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-09 19:33   ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-07-09 21:37     ` Jaume Barcelo
2013-07-16  1:15     ` Lawrence Stewart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130709105636.61f590cc@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=jaume.barcelo@upf.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox