From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C93B201253 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 05:04:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r7LC3tXX003957 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 21 Aug 2013 08:03:55 -0400 Received: from localhost (ovpn-116-88.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.88]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r7LC3q0s004657; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 08:03:53 -0400 Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 14:03:50 +0200 From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Message-ID: <20130821140350.2b953007@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20130820151650.GA18016@kroah.com> References: <20130820132629.51618797@redhat.com> <20130820151650.GA18016@kroah.com> Organization: Red Hat Inc. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.11.11 Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, bufferbloat-list , David Miller Subject: Re: [Bloat] ADSL/ATM linklayer tc shaping regression fix commits for stable X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:04:00 -0000 On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 08:16:50 -0700 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 01:26:29PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: [...] > If there are issues with 3.10, that's a different story. > > > Refactor improvements (v3.11-rc1): > > commit 130d3d68b52 (net_sched: psched_ratecfg_precompute() improvements) Needed because it fixes the accuracy of the rate calc. > > The linklayer ATM/ADSL fix, reached 3.11-rc6: > > commit 8a8e3d84b17 (net_sched: restore "linklayer atm" handling) Needed because we broke userspace interface. > David sends me the networking patches for the stable tree, and if he > thinks these are applicable, then I'll take them. DaveM, please? What do you want me to do, submit this req/patches somehow? (Can see that is not currently on your stable queue via: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/bundle/davem/stable/?state=*) -- Best regards, Jesper Dangaard Brouer MSc.CS, Sr. Network Kernel Developer at Red Hat Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer