From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
To: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
Cc: "Akhtar, Shahid \(Shahid\)" <shahid.akhtar@alcatel-lucent.com>,
"iccrg@irtf.org" <iccrg@irtf.org>, "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>,
bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] [iccrg] [aqm] AQM deployment status?
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 16:35:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130925143510.GA6191@sesse.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <FB9F71A5-C19E-405D-A598-BC704C38B3AA@netapp.com>
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 02:31:21PM +0000, Eggert, Lars wrote:
>> Most routers/switches/access equipment support RFC 2309, which is a
>> description of RED.
> I've heard that statement from many different people. I wonder if it is
> actually true. Is there any hard data on this?
I don't have hard data, but my soft data is that generally, devices branded
as switches (including L3 switches) do not support it. Routers might.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-25 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-24 17:21 [Bloat] " Naeem Khademi
2013-09-24 17:24 ` [Bloat] [aqm] " LOCHIN Emmanuel
2013-09-25 14:20 ` Akhtar, Shahid (Shahid)
2013-09-25 14:31 ` [Bloat] [iccrg] " Eggert, Lars
2013-09-25 14:35 ` Steinar H. Gunderson [this message]
2013-09-25 18:51 ` Akhtar, Shahid (Shahid)
2013-09-25 19:19 ` [Bloat] [aqm] [iccrg] " Naeem Khademi
2013-09-27 16:49 ` Akhtar, Shahid (Shahid)
2013-09-25 19:24 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2013-09-26 9:39 ` [Bloat] [iccrg] [aqm] " Scheffenegger, Richard
2013-09-27 2:59 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2013-09-27 9:06 ` Eggert, Lars
2013-09-28 7:01 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2013-09-28 7:04 ` Eggert, Lars
2013-09-29 1:16 ` [Bloat] [aqm] [iccrg] " Bob Briscoe
2013-09-29 9:37 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2013-09-27 13:53 ` [Bloat] [iccrg] [aqm] " Scheffenegger, Richard
2013-09-28 6:59 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2013-11-13 17:50 ` [Bloat] [aqm] [iccrg] " Fred Baker (fred)
2013-10-12 3:18 ` [Bloat] [iccrg] [aqm] " Michael Richardson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130925143510.GA6191@sesse.net \
--to=sgunderson@bigfoot.com \
--cc=aqm@ietf.org \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=iccrg@irtf.org \
--cc=lars@netapp.com \
--cc=shahid.akhtar@alcatel-lucent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox