From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Received: from mail-pd0-f177.google.com (mail-pd0-f177.google.com
	[209.85.192.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA34A21F209
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f177.google.com with SMTP id p10so1677667pdj.36
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=2cSjHL8XkmvrbuXC/JJtcH8QQToLFDmwzoQ5Lrnhm+8=;
	b=B4vRQ5+wC0Z9YDtSQ1YilTA3pYuctYEIfkxDJvCKS415zLfuvUPHWcarLkJNEjxFJp
	p0R2kJaNZeNBkTfo41f3hhTKAJ3F5oW3ihoccUNixP8qt6JlyTNnDbLMr7TEqDIXswJJ
	Gx3FCih8kS0DejqvGUca34Dv+Z7rcBmgOLd96c1Kniu+qUga2vBNwri1wa9LXUGtm1mO
	idk3iiAI4lc4vI8+su63ArdQQgVYYGaH/gI/BwXjVF3/JxtZw3ZpdGDmD/k9p+ln/tFG
	PjuGy+byCPtQ4fZ4IkiiVU3mebrxcPFmuC9H/fM5nENJof2mANGnfaS/lOwoKUb5tPzm
	vy3A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQluAJnev0U0aA24kNSnhZdGuuvGb0lhS/N4ryC+oQr0ozFD5qmpF+mfQOxUmgMj+yB02hlf
X-Received: by 10.68.209.133 with SMTP id mm5mr230810pbc.157.1383177463801;
	Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:57:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net
	(static-50-53-83-51.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net. [50.53.83.51])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ry4sm1224090pab.4.2013.10.30.16.57.43
	for <multiple recipients>
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:57:43 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:57:40 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Message-ID: <20131030165740.26505b62@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1310310032480.1838@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <20131030162534.29f34ada@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1310310032480.1838@uplift.swm.pp.se>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bloat] T-Mobile LTE buffer bloat
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 23:57:44 -0000

On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 00:34:12 +0100 (CET)
Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:

> On Wed, 30 Oct 2013, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> 
> > Not surprisingly it has huge bloat and a stupid http proxy that 
> > netalyzer claims rewrites images.
> 
> This could be done in the provider network, did you try it without the 
> thingie?

There is zero configuration of proxy, it is just a LTE <-> wifi hotspot.
I suspect some caching (or commercial interest) at their end.